Literature DB >> 17356289

Risk factors for aspiration pneumonia after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Toshiro Kitamura1, Hajime Nakase, Hidehiko Iizuka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is generally used for long-term enteral nutrition. Patients who require PEG placement are often very sick, and postoperative complications, especially aspiration pneumonia, can be fatal.
OBJECTIVE: In this study we investigated the risk factors for aspiration pneumonia after PEG using a simple two-step swallowing provocation test (S-SPT), as reported in 1999 by Teramoto et al.
METHODS: The study included 29 patients (10 men, 19 women; mean age 84.6 years) who underwent S-SPT before PEG. We evaluated the presence of reflux esophagitis (RE) and esophageal hiatal hernia (EHH) with PEG. According to the S-SPT results, a normal response to the 1st step S-SPT was given a score of 0, a normal response to the 2nd step S-SPT was given a score of 1, and an abnormal response to the 2nd step S-SPT was given a score of 3. In addition to S-SPT, the presence of RE was given a score of 3, the absence of RE was given a score of 0, the presence of EHH was given a score of 2, and the absence of EHH was given a score of 0. We evaluated the association between the presence of aspiration pneumonia, as an early and critical complication, up to 1 month after PEG and determined the total risk score (score of S-SPT+ score of RE+ score of EHH).
RESULTS: The group with an abnormal response to the 2nd step S-SPT and the group with RE both exhibited aspiration pneumonia. The patients with aspiration pneumonia all achieved total scores > or =3, and 8 of 13 patients without aspiration pneumonia achieved scores < or =2.
CONCLUSIONS: S-SPT is particularly useful in PEG patients. The scores provided by S-SPT and endoscopic examination can be very useful for aspiration pneumonia after PEG. The patients with scores < or =2 appear to be at very low risk for aspiration pneumonia, and patients with the scores > or =3 should be carefully followed up. Copyright 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17356289     DOI: 10.1159/000100898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontology        ISSN: 0304-324X            Impact factor:   5.140


  9 in total

Review 1.  Conceptual model for reducing infections and antimicrobial resistance in skilled nursing facilities: focusing on residents with indwelling devices.

Authors:  Lona Mody; Suzanne F Bradley; Andrzej Galecki; Russell N Olmsted; James T Fitzgerald; Carol A Kauffman; Sanjay Saint; Sarah L Krein
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Investigation and prediction of enteral nutrition problems after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Shiro Yokohama; Masaru Aoshima; Yukiomi Nakade; Junya Shindo; Junichi Maruyama; Masashi Yoneda
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Complications of and controversies associated with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: report of a case and literature review.

Authors:  Jonathan Z Potack; Sita Chokhavatia
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-06-17

4.  Unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy in elderly and bedridden patients.

Authors:  Mika Yuki; Yuji Amano; Yoshinori Komazawa; Hiroyuki Fukuhara; Toshihiro Shizuku; Shun Yamamoto; Yoshikazu Kinoshita
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment of myositis: recent advances.

Authors:  P-O Carstens; J Schmidt
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Differences in the incidence of postoperative pneumonia after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy between liquid and semi-solid nutrient administration.

Authors:  Hirohito Muramatsu; Tetsuro Okamoto; Tomoko Kubo; Midori Matsuki; Sonomi Iwata; Akemi Fujiwara; Naoya Miyajima; Hidetoshi Inomata; Tomokazu Hoshi; Yoshiro Goto
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Special considerations for endoscopists on PEG indications in older patients.

Authors:  Fabrizio Cardin
Journal:  ISRN Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11-25

8.  Endoscopic gastrostomy, nasojejunal and oral feeding comparison in aspiration pneumonia patients.

Authors:  Ozge E Onur; Ender Onur; Ozlem Guneysel; Haldun Akoglu; Arzu Denizbasi; Hasan Demir
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.852

9.  Different clinical predictors of aspiration pneumonia in dysphagic stroke patients related to stroke lesion: A STROBE-complaint retrospective study.

Authors:  Kwang Jae Yu; Hyunseok Moon; Donghwi Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.