Literature DB >> 17356215

Comparison of four freely available frameworks for image processing and visualization that use ITK.

Ingmar Bitter1, Robert Van Uitert, Ivo Wolf, Luis Ibáñez, Jan-Martin Kuhnigk.   

Abstract

Most image processing and visualization applications allow users to configure computation parameters and manipulate the resulting visualizations. SCIRun, VolView, MeVisLab, and the Medical Interaction Toolkit (MITK) are four image processing and visualization frameworks that were built for these purposes. All frameworks are freely available and all allow the use of the ITK C++ library. In this paper, the benefits and limitations of each visualization framework are presented to aid both application developers and users in the decision of which framework may be best to use for their application. The analysis is based on more than 50 evaluation criteria, functionalities, and example applications. We report implementation times for various steps in the creation of a reference application in each of the compared frameworks. The data-flow programming frameworks, SCIRun and MeVisLab, were determined to be best for developing application prototypes, while VolView was advantageous for nonautomatic end-user applications based on existing ITK functionalities, and MITK was preferable for automated end-user applications that might include new ITK classes specifically designed for the application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17356215     DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2007.1001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph        ISSN: 1077-2626            Impact factor:   4.579


  13 in total

1.  Black box integration of computer-aided diagnosis into PACS deserves a second chance: results of a usability study concerning bone age assessment.

Authors:  Ina Geldermann; Christoph Grouls; Christiane Kuhl; Thomas M Deserno; Cord Spreckelsen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  GRAPE: a graphical pipeline environment for image analysis in adaptive magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Refaat E Gabr; Getaneh B Tefera; William J Allen; Amol S Pednekar; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Why do commercial CT scanners still employ traditional, filtered back-projection for image reconstruction?

Authors:  Xiaochuan Pan; Emil Y Sidky; Michael Vannier
Journal:  Inverse Probl       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.407

4.  Computer tomographic analysis of organ motion caused by respiration and intraoperative pneumoperitoneum in a porcine model for navigated minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Felix Nickel; Hannes G Kenngott; Jochen Neuhaus; Nathanael Andrews; Carly Garrow; Johannes Kast; Christof M Sommer; Tobias Gehrig; Carsten N Gutt; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Automated identification of neurons in 3D confocal datasets from zebrafish brainstem.

Authors:  M Kamali; L J Day; D H Brooks; X Zhou; D M O'Malley
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.758

6.  Neuroimaging study designs, computational analyses and data provenance using the LONI pipeline.

Authors:  Ivo Dinov; Kamen Lozev; Petros Petrosyan; Zhizhong Liu; Paul Eggert; Jonathan Pierce; Alen Zamanyan; Shruthi Chakrapani; John Van Horn; D Stott Parker; Rico Magsipoc; Kelvin Leung; Boris Gutman; Roger Woods; Arthur Toga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Micro-computed tomography of pulmonary fibrosis in mice induced by adenoviral gene transfer of biologically active transforming growth factor-β1.

Authors:  Thomas Rodt; Christian von Falck; Sabine Dettmer; Roman Halter; Regina Maus; Kjetil Ask; Martin Kolb; Jack Gauldie; Florian Länger; Ludwig Hoy; Tobias Welte; Michael Galanski; Ulrich A Maus; Jürgen Borlak
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2010-12-22

8.  Systematic Parameterization, Storage, and Representation of Volumetric DICOM Data.

Authors:  Felix Fischer; M Alper Selver; Sinem Gezer; Oğuz Dicle; Walter Hillen
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 1.553

9.  Efficient, Distributed and Interactive Neuroimaging Data Analysis Using the LONI Pipeline.

Authors:  Ivo D Dinov; John D Van Horn; Kamen M Lozev; Rico Magsipoc; Petros Petrosyan; Zhizhong Liu; Allan Mackenzie-Graham; Paul Eggert; Douglas S Parker; Arthur W Toga
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 4.081

10.  Rapid development of medical imaging tools with open-source libraries.

Authors:  Jesus J Caban; Alark Joshi; Paul Nagy
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 4.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.