Literature DB >> 17356028

Insurance coverage, medical care use, and short-term health changes following an unintentional injury or the onset of a chronic condition.

Jack Hadley1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Given the large and increasing number of uninsured US individuals, identifying the health consequences of being uninsured has assumed increased importance.
OBJECTIVE: To compare medical care use and short-term health changes among US uninsured individuals and insured nonelderly individuals following a health shock caused by either an unintentional injury or the onset of a chronic condition. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis of longitudinal data from Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys (1997-2004) limited to nonelderly individuals whose insurance status was established for 2 months prior to 1 or more unintentional injuries (20 783 cases among 15 866 individuals) and onset of 1 or more chronic conditions (10 485 cases among 7954 individuals). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported medical care use and change in short-term general health status following the health shock.
RESULTS: After experiencing a health shock, uninsured individuals were less likely to obtain any medical care (unintentional injury [UI] group: 78.8% uninsured vs 88.7% insured [adjusted odds ratio {AOR}, 0.47; 95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.43-0.51]; new chronic condition [NCC] group: 81.7% uninsured vs 91.5% insured [AOR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.40-0.50]) and more likely not to have received any recommended follow-up care (UI group: 19.3% uninsured vs 9.2% insured [AOR, 2.59; 95% CI, 2.15-3.11]; NCC group: 9.4% uninsured vs 4.4% insured [AOR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.32-2.06]). Based on the AORs, uninsured individuals with UIs had fewer outpatient visits (6.1% uninsured vs 9.0% insured; AOR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.63-0.80]), office-based visits (41.8% uninsured vs 57.3% insured; AOR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.56-0.62]), and prescription medicines (35.5% uninsured vs 35.6% insured; AOR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.67-0.75]). Uninsured individuals with an NCC had fewer office-based visits (58.9% uninsured vs 68.3% insured; AOR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.72-0.82]) and prescription medicines (52.7% uninsured vs 61.7% insured; AOR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.57-0.76]). Higher proportions of uninsured individuals reported a decrease in health status (classified as much worse) approximately 3.5 months after the health shock (UI group: 9.8% uninsured vs 6.7% insured; AOR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.75-0.98]; NCC group: 12.3% uninsured vs 10.1% insured; AOR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.68-0.80]). Uninsured individuals with UIs were more likely to report not being fully recovered and no longer receiving treatment. At approximately 7 months after the health shock, uninsured individuals with NCCs still reported worse health status.
CONCLUSIONS: Among individuals who experienced a health shock caused by an unintentional injury or a new chronic condition, uninsured individuals reported receiving less medical care and poorer short-term changes in health than those with insurance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17356028     DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.10.1073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  59 in total

1.  Insurance status and health-related quality-of-life disparities after trauma: results from a nationally representative survey in the US.

Authors:  Suliman Alghnam; Eric B Schneider; Renan C Castillo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  The association between insurance status and emergency department disposition of injured California children.

Authors:  Anna Chen Arroyo; N Ewen Wang; Olga Saynina; Jay Bhattacharya; Paul H Wise
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Insurance Enrollment at a Student-Run Free Clinic After the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Megan McGeehan; Rebecca DeMaria; Pamela Charney; Ashita S Batavia
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-08

Review 4.  The U.S. presidential election and health care workforce policy.

Authors:  Matthew D McHugh; Linda H Aiken; Richard A Cooper; Phillip Miller
Journal:  Policy Polit Nurs Pract       Date:  2008-04-24

5.  Effect of expanding medicaid for parents on children's health insurance coverage: lessons from the Oregon experiment.

Authors:  Jennifer E DeVoe; Miguel Marino; Heather Angier; Jean P O'Malley; Courtney Crawford; Christine Nelson; Carrie J Tillotson; Steffani R Bailey; Charles Gallia; Rachel Gold
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 16.193

6.  Being uninsured is bad for your health: can medical homes play a role in treating the uninsurance ailment?

Authors:  Jennifer E Devoe
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 7.  An official American Thoracic Society systematic review: the association between health insurance status and access, care delivery, and outcomes for patients who are critically ill.

Authors:  Robert A Fowler; Lori-Anne Noyahr; J Daryl Thornton; Ruxandra Pinto; Jeremy M Kahn; Neill K J Adhikari; Peter M Dodek; Nadia A Khan; Tom Kalb; Andrea Hill; James M O'Brien; David Evans; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Educational success and adult health: findings from the Chicago longitudinal study.

Authors:  James Topitzes; Olga Godes; Joshua P Mersky; Sudi Ceglarek; Arthur J Reynolds
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2009-06

9.  Risk of losing insurance during the transition into adulthood among insured youth with disabilities.

Authors:  Grace Wang; David Grembowski; Carolyn Watts
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2010-01

10.  Insurance status predicts access to care and outcomes of vascular disease.

Authors:  Jeannine K Giacovelli; Natalia Egorova; Roman Nowygrod; Annetine Gelijns; K Craig Kent; Nicholas J Morrissey
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 4.268

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.