Literature DB >> 17355855

Staging functional damage in glaucoma: review of different classification methods.

Paolo Brusini1, Chris A Johnson.   

Abstract

Classification of glaucomatous visual field defects for different severity levels is important. The reasons for this are numerous, and include: to distinguish between healthy and diseased individuals, to have homogeneous grouping criteria when perimetry is used to define the severity of glaucoma, to adjust therapy on the basis of disease severity, to describe visual field conditions in a short and simple format, to monitor the progression of the disease, and to provide a common language for both clinical and research purposes. Many severity classification methods have been proposed, although none have had widespread use in clinical practice. Other methods, like the cumulative defect curve (Bebie curve), can be used to distinguish the type of visual field loss as diffuse, localized, or mixed. This article provides a review of the main classification methods that have been proposed in the past 40 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17355855     DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2006.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0039-6257            Impact factor:   6.048


  36 in total

1.  OCT Glaucoma Staging System: a new method for retinal nerve fiber layer damage classification using spectral-domain OCT.

Authors:  P Brusini
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Why Do People (Still) Go Blind from Glaucoma?

Authors:  Remo Susanna; Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; George A Cioffi; Robert Ritch
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Evaluation of human sclera after femtosecond laser ablation using two photon and confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Hui Sun; Ronald Kurtz; Tibor Juhasz
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  The visualFields package: a tool for analysis and visualization of visual fields.

Authors:  Iván Marín-Franch; William H Swanson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Clinical Correlates of Computationally Derived Visual Field Defect Archetypes in Patients from a Glaucoma Clinic.

Authors:  Sophie Cai; Tobias Elze; Peter J Bex; Janey L Wiggs; Louis R Pasquale; Lucy Q Shen
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.424

6.  Association of Macular Visual Field Measurements With Glaucoma Staging Systems.

Authors:  Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Ashley Sun; Ravivarn Jarukasetphon; Rashmi Rajshekhar; Lynn Shi; Dana M Blumberg; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch; Donald C Hood
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 7.389

7.  Perimetric progression using the Visual Field Index and the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study score and its clinical correlations.

Authors:  Juan Gros-Otero; Miguel Castejón; Javier Paz-Moreno; Dimitrios Mikropoulos; Miguel Teus
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-09-01

Review 8.  Improving our understanding, and detection, of glaucomatous damage: An approach based upon optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Authors:  Donald C Hood
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 21.198

9.  Outcomes of 1.8-3.0 mm incision phacoemulsification combined with trabeculectomy for primary angle-closure glaucoma with cataract.

Authors:  Qing Wang; Zheng-Xuan Jiang; Rong-Feng Liao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

10.  Discriminating ability of spectral domain optical coherence tomography in different stages of glaucoma.

Authors:  Amal M Elbendary; Randa Mohamed Helal
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.