OBJECTIVE: This open-label, parallel-group study determined the pharmacokinetics of garenoxacin in subjects with severe renal impairment, including subjects maintained on dialysis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Subjects were assigned to one of four groups according to their underlying renal function: creatinine clearance (CL(cr)) > 80 mL/min, CL(cr) < 30 mL/min, hemodialysis (HD), and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Subjects received a single oral 600-mg dose of garenoxacin. Administration of garenoxacin to subjects receiving hemodialysis was completed in two phases separated by 14 days: 3 h before HD (phase 1) and immediately after HD (phase 2). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Plasma and urine or dialysate samples were analyzed for garenoxacin, and single-dose pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated. Safety was assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-five subjects received garenoxacin. Compared with healthy controls, garenoxacin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration were increased by 51% and lowered by 20%, respectively, in subjects with severe renal impairment. The terminal half-life was prolonged in subjects with severe renal impairment compared with healthy controls (26.5 +/- 7 h vs 14.4 +/- 3 h, respectively). In subjects receiving HD or CAPD, removal of garenoxacin from systemic circulation was relatively inefficient (HD, 1.5-11.5%; CAPD, 3%), suggesting no need for a supplemental dose of garenoxacin after dialysis. Garenoxacin was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the broad therapeutic index of garenoxacin, the effects of renal impairment on garenoxacin exposure are not considered clinically significant. There was a modest increase in AUC in subjects with severe renal impairment and the magnitude of the changes was not considered clinically relevant.
OBJECTIVE: This open-label, parallel-group study determined the pharmacokinetics of garenoxacin in subjects with severe renal impairment, including subjects maintained on dialysis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Subjects were assigned to one of four groups according to their underlying renal function: creatinine clearance (CL(cr)) > 80 mL/min, CL(cr) < 30 mL/min, hemodialysis (HD), and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Subjects received a single oral 600-mg dose of garenoxacin. Administration of garenoxacin to subjects receiving hemodialysis was completed in two phases separated by 14 days: 3 h before HD (phase 1) and immediately after HD (phase 2). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Plasma and urine or dialysate samples were analyzed for garenoxacin, and single-dose pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated. Safety was assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-five subjects received garenoxacin. Compared with healthy controls, garenoxacin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration were increased by 51% and lowered by 20%, respectively, in subjects with severe renal impairment. The terminal half-life was prolonged in subjects with severe renal impairment compared with healthy controls (26.5 +/- 7 h vs 14.4 +/- 3 h, respectively). In subjects receiving HD or CAPD, removal of garenoxacin from systemic circulation was relatively inefficient (HD, 1.5-11.5%; CAPD, 3%), suggesting no need for a supplemental dose of garenoxacin after dialysis. Garenoxacin was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the broad therapeutic index of garenoxacin, the effects of renal impairment on garenoxacin exposure are not considered clinically significant. There was a modest increase in AUC in subjects with severe renal impairment and the magnitude of the changes was not considered clinically relevant.