Literature DB >> 17355677

Treatment failure in emergency department patients with cellulitis.

Heather Murray1, Ian Stiell, George Wells.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the rate of treatment failure in emergency department patients with cellulitis.
METHODS: This prospective observational convenience study enrolled adult patients with uncomplicated cellulitis. Physicians performed a standardized assessment prior to treatment. To calculate the interrater reliability of the assessment, duplicate data collection forms were completed on a small subsample of patients. Treatment failure was defined as the occurrence of any one of the following events after the initial emergency department visit: incision and drainage of abscess; change in antibiotics (not due to allergy/intolerance); specialist consultation; or, hospital admission. Comparison of means and proportions between the 2 groups was performed with univariate associations, using parametric or non-parametric tests where appropriate.
RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were enrolled; 57% were male, the mean age was 48 (standard deviation 19), 71 (95%) patients had extremity cellulitis and 10 (13%) had abscess with cellulitis. Fourteen episodes (18.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 11%-28%) were classified as treatment failures, with an oral antibiotic failure rate of 6.8% (95% CI 2%-22%) and an emergency department-based intravenous antibiotic failure rate of 26.1% (95% CI 16%-40%). Patients with treatment failure were older (mean age 59 yr v. 46 yr, p = 0.02) and more likely to have been taking oral antibiotics at enrollment (50% v. 16.4%, p = 0.01). Patients with a larger surface area of infection were also more likely to fail treatment (465.1 cm2 v. 101.5 cm2, p < 0.01). Interrater agreement was high for the presence of fever (kappa 1.0) and the size of surface area of infection (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.98), but low for assessments of both severity (kappa 0.35) and need for admission (kappa 0.46).
CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of cellulitis with daily emergency department-based intravenous antibiotics has a failure rate of more than 25% in our centre. Cellulitis patients with a larger surface area of infection and previous (failed) oral therapy are more likely to fail treatment. Further research should focus on defining eligibility for treatment with emergency department-based intravenous antibiotics.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 17355677     DOI: 10.1017/s1481803500014342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CJEM        ISSN: 1481-8035            Impact factor:   2.410


  10 in total

1.  Treatment failure definitions for non-purulent skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review.

Authors:  Krishan Yadav; Avik Nath; Kathryn N Suh; Lindsey Sikora; Debra Eagles
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Obesity and Heart Failure as Predictors of Failure in Outpatient Skin and Soft Tissue Infections.

Authors:  Erin L Conway; John A Sellick; Kari Kurtzhalts; Kari A Mergenhagen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Finding the niche: An interprofessional approach to defining oritavancin use criteria in the emergency department.

Authors:  Jared Baxa; Erin McCreary; Lucas Schulz; Michael Pulia
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 2.469

4.  Is coverage of S. aureus necessary in cellulitis/erysipelas? A literature review.

Authors:  Stamatis Karakonstantis
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.553

5.  Prevalence and predictors of initial oral antibiotic treatment failure in adult emergency department patients with cellulitis: a pilot study.

Authors:  Michael Quirke; Fiona Boland; Tom Fahey; Ronan O'Sullivan; Arnold Hill; Ian Stiell; Abel Wakai
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Clinical and cost-effectiveness, safety and acceptability of community intravenous antibiotic service models: CIVAS systematic review.

Authors:  E D Mitchell; C Czoski Murray; D Meads; J Minton; J Wright; M Twiddy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Deviating from IDSA treatment guidelines for non-purulent skin infections increases the risk of treatment failure in emergency department patients.

Authors:  J P Haran; E Wilsterman; T Zeoli; M Goulding; E McLendon; M A Clark
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.451

8.  Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections Treated with Intravenous Antibiotics in the Emergency Department or Observational Unit: Experience at the Detroit Medical Center.

Authors:  Kimberly C Claeys; Abdalhamid M Lagnf; Trishna B Patel; Manu G Jacob; Susan L Davis; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2015-06-09

9.  Evaluation of Skin and Soft Tissue Infection Outcomes and Admission Decisions in Emergency Department Patients.

Authors:  Nicholas Black; Jon W Schrock
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 1.112

10.  Prevalence and predictors of oral to intravenous antibiotic switch among adult emergency department patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: a pilot, prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Michael Quirke; Niamh Mitchell; Jarlath Varley; Stephen Kelly; Fiona Boland; Adrian Moughty; Joseph McKeever; Tom Fahey; Abel Wakai
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.