Literature DB >> 17355569

Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change.

Claire Kremen1, Neal M Williams, Marcelo A Aizen, Barbara Gemmill-Herren, Gretchen LeBuhn, Robert Minckley, Laurence Packer, Simon G Potts, T'ai Roulston, Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter, Diego P Vázquez, Rachael Winfree, Laurie Adams, Elizabeth E Crone, Sarah S Greenleaf, Timothy H Keitt, Alexandra-Maria Klein, James Regetz, Taylor H Ricketts.   

Abstract

Many ecosystem services are delivered by organisms that depend on habitats that are segregated spatially or temporally from the location where services are provided. Management of mobile organisms contributing to ecosystem services requires consideration not only of the local scale where services are delivered, but also the distribution of resources at the landscape scale, and the foraging ranges and dispersal movements of the mobile agents. We develop a conceptual model for exploring how one such mobile-agent-based ecosystem service (MABES), pollination, is affected by land-use change, and then generalize the model to other MABES. The model includes interactions and feedbacks among policies affecting land use, market forces and the biology of the organisms involved. Animal-mediated pollination contributes to the production of goods of value to humans such as crops; it also bolsters reproduction of wild plants on which other services or service-providing organisms depend. About one-third of crop production depends on animal pollinators, while 60-90% of plant species require an animal pollinator. The sensitivity of mobile organisms to ecological factors that operate across spatial scales makes the services provided by a given community of mobile agents highly contextual. Services vary, depending on the spatial and temporal distribution of resources surrounding the site, and on biotic interactions occurring locally, such as competition among pollinators for resources, and among plants for pollinators. The value of the resulting goods or services may feed back via market-based forces to influence land-use policies, which in turn influence land management practices that alter local habitat conditions and landscape structure. Developing conceptual models for MABES aids in identifying knowledge gaps, determining research priorities, and targeting interventions that can be applied in an adaptive management context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17355569     DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01018.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  139 in total

1.  Non-additive effects of pollen limitation and self-incompatibility reduce plant reproductive success and population viability.

Authors:  Andrew G Young; Linda M Broadhurst; Peter H Thrall
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Biodiversity in the context of ecosystem services: the applied need for systems approaches.

Authors:  Ken Norris
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Species richness matters for the quality of ecosystem services: a test using seed dispersal by frugivorous birds.

Authors:  Daniel García; Daniel Martínez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Establishing the evidence base for maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem function in the oil palm landscapes of South East Asia.

Authors:  William A Foster; Jake L Snaddon; Edgar C Turner; Tom M Fayle; Timothy D Cockerill; M D Farnon Ellwood; Gavin R Broad; Arthur Y C Chung; Paul Eggleton; Chey Vun Khen; Kalsum M Yusah
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Differential effects of habitat isolation and landscape composition on wasps, bees, and their enemies.

Authors:  Christof Schüepp; John D Herrmann; Felix Herzog; Martin H Schmidt-Entling
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments.

Authors:  Sandra Díaz; Sandra Lavorel; Francesco de Bello; Fabien Quétier; Karl Grigulis; T Matthew Robson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Proximity to forest edge does not affect crop production despite pollen limitation.

Authors:  Natacha P Chacoff; Marcelo A Aizen; Valeria Aschero
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Pollination and reproduction of a self-incompatible forest herb in hedgerow corridors and forest patches.

Authors:  Reto Schmucki; Sylvie de Blois
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  Accounting for ecosystem services as a way to understand the requirements for sustainable development.

Authors:  Karl-Göran Mäler; Sara Aniyar; Asa Jansson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  How much does agriculture depend on pollinators? Lessons from long-term trends in crop production.

Authors:  Marcelo A Aizen; Lucas A Garibaldi; Saul A Cunningham; Alexandra M Klein
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.