Jean Shoveller1, Cathy Chabot, Judith A Soon, Marc Levine. 1. Department of Health Care and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. jshovell@interchange.ubc.ca
Abstract
CONTEXT: Despite advances related to the provision of emergency contraception in Canada, particularly the granting of independent prescriptive authority to pharmacists in 2000, little is known about the ways in which women perceive potential barriers to using it. METHODS: In 2004, an ethnically diverse sample of 52 women living in Greater Vancouver participated in interviews that were analyzed for an assessment of women's knowledge, attitudes and experiences related to emergency contraception, with particular attention to the ways in which ethnicity affected their stories. RESULTS: Participants generally misperceived emergency contraception as an abortifacient, and often mistakenly thought that it has long-term effects on health and fertility. Knowledge gaps regarding reproductive physiology impeded clear understanding of when it is most effective. Participants also reported receiving subtle and sometimes overtly stigmatizing messages from providers when they sought emergency contraception. Asian and South Asian women were particularly concerned about negative interactions with providers; for example, they feared that female providers from their sociocultural community might recognize, chastise or gossip about them. Institutional policies (e.g., a Catholic hospital's refusal to provide the method), coupled with low awareness of pharmacists' prescriptive authority, also created barriers to use. CONCLUSIONS: Women's ability to benefit from emergency contraception is hampered by lack of knowledge and conservative cultural or social mores. Serious contextual and structural shifts are required before woman-centered approaches to provision of the method become the norm.
CONTEXT: Despite advances related to the provision of emergency contraception in Canada, particularly the granting of independent prescriptive authority to pharmacists in 2000, little is known about the ways in which women perceive potential barriers to using it. METHODS: In 2004, an ethnically diverse sample of 52 women living in Greater Vancouver participated in interviews that were analyzed for an assessment of women's knowledge, attitudes and experiences related to emergency contraception, with particular attention to the ways in which ethnicity affected their stories. RESULTS:Participants generally misperceived emergency contraception as an abortifacient, and often mistakenly thought that it has long-term effects on health and fertility. Knowledge gaps regarding reproductive physiology impeded clear understanding of when it is most effective. Participants also reported receiving subtle and sometimes overtly stigmatizing messages from providers when they sought emergency contraception. Asian and South Asian women were particularly concerned about negative interactions with providers; for example, they feared that female providers from their sociocultural community might recognize, chastise or gossip about them. Institutional policies (e.g., a Catholic hospital's refusal to provide the method), coupled with low awareness of pharmacists' prescriptive authority, also created barriers to use. CONCLUSIONS:Women's ability to benefit from emergency contraception is hampered by lack of knowledge and conservative cultural or social mores. Serious contextual and structural shifts are required before woman-centered approaches to provision of the method become the norm.
Authors: Christine Metusela; Jane Ussher; Janette Perz; Alexandra Hawkey; Marina Morrow; Renu Narchal; Jane Estoesta; Melissa Monteiro Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2017-12
Authors: Philip B Adongo; Philip T-N Tabong; Thomas B Azongo; James F Phillips; Mallory C Sheff; Allison E Stone; Placide Tapsoba Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2014-09-05
Authors: Syed Irfan Karim; Farhana Irfan; Norah Al Rowais; Basma Al Zahrani; Riaz Qureshi; Bedoor H Al Qadrah Journal: Pak J Med Sci Date: 2015 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.088
Authors: Anthony Idowu Ajayi; Ezebunwa Ethelbert Nwokocha; Wilson Akpan; Oladele Vincent Adeniyi Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-10-04 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Jane M Ussher; Janette Perz; Christine Metusela; Alexandra J Hawkey; Marina Morrow; Renu Narchal; Jane Estoesta Journal: Arch Sex Behav Date: 2017-01-12