Literature DB >> 17355297

Macrosomic infants are not all equal.

Bronwyn Anne Sinclair1, Janet Alison Rowan, Oliver Timothy Hainsworth.   

Abstract

AIMS: To see whether macrosomic infants have different morbidity according to maternal screening results for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and ethnicity.
METHODS: After excluding infants of women with diabetes, the National Women's Hospital database identified 134 infants who were delivered in 2003 and weighed >or= 4500 g. Case notes were reviewed to record risk factors for macrosomia, delivery details and neonatal morbidity. Outcomes were analysed according to screening results for GDM and compared between Polynesian and Asian women.
RESULTS: Body mass index (BMI) was calculated in 29% of women, and GDM screening was undertaken in 51%. Infants of women who had a screening glucose < 7.2 mmol/L compared to >or= 7.8 mmol/L had lower rates of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (6.4 vs 28.6%, P=0.049), had less respiratory distress (3.2 vs 23.8%P=0.033) and display a trend to less require intravenous dextrose (6.4 vs 23.8%P=0.10). Maternal BMI was lower in Asian (26.5 +/- 4.4 kg/m(2)) compared to Polynesian women (35.2 +/- 8.1 kg/m(2), P=0.008). More Asian women had a Caesarean delivery (73.3 vs 25%P<0.001) and their infants were more likely to be admitted to NICU (33.3 vs 7.7%P=0.02), require intravenous dextrose (20 vs 1.9%P=0.03) and have respiratory distress (26.7 vs 3.8%P=0.02).
CONCLUSION: Risk factors for macrosomia are not assessed adequately, which may contribute to morbidity. Using a birthweight >or= 4500 g to define macrosomia is associated with disparate morbidity between ethnicities that have different body compositions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17355297     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00694.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  6 in total

1.  Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.

Authors:  D Kabiri; R Romero; D W Gudicha; E Hernandez-Andrade; P Pacora; N Benshalom-Tirosh; D Tirosh; L Yeo; O Erez; S S Hassan; A L Tarca
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 2.  Gestational diabetes mellitus: Challenges for different ethnic groups.

Authors:  Lili Yuen; Vincent W Wong
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2015-07-25

3.  Glycemia and its relationship to outcomes in the metformin in gestational diabetes trial.

Authors:  Janet A Rowan; Wanzhen Gao; William M Hague; Harold David McIntyre
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Gestational diabetes and macrosomia by race/ethnicity in Hawaii.

Authors:  Pai-Jong Stacy Tsai; Emily Roberson; Timothy Dye
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-10-01

5.  Does induction of labor for constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetuses identified in utero reduce maternal morbidity?

Authors:  Françoise Vendittelli; Olivier Rivière; Brigitte Neveu; Didier Lémery
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Spatial quantile regression with application to high and low child birth weight in Malawi.

Authors:  Alfred Ngwira
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.