Literature DB >> 17354441

The countries and languages that dominate biological research at the beginning of the 21st century.

Julian Monge-Nájera1, Vanessa Nielsen.   

Abstract

Traditionally, studies of scientific productivity are biased in two ways: they are based on Current Contents, an index centered in British and American journals, and they seldom correct for population size, ignoring the relative effort that each society places in research. We studied national productivity for biology using a more representative index, the Biological Abstracts, and analyzed both total and relative productivity. English dominates biological publications with 87% (no other individual language reaches 2%). If the USA is considered a region by itself, it occupies the first place in per capita production of biology papers, with at least twice the productivity of either Asia or Europe. Canada, Oceania and Latin America occupy an intermediate position. The global output of scientific papers is dominated by Europe, USA. Japan, Canada, China and India. When corrected for population size, the countries with the greatest productivity of biology papers are the Nordic nations, Israel, Switzerland, Netherlands, Australia, Saint Lucia and Montserrat. The predominance of English as the language of biological research found in this study shows a continuation of the trend initiated around the year 1900. The large relative productivity of the USA reflects the importance that American society gives to science as the basis for technological and economic development, but the USA's share of total scientific output has decreased from 44% in 1983 to 34% in 2002, while there is a greater growth of science in India, Japan and Latin America, among others. The increasing share obtained by China and India may reflect a recent change in attitude towards funding science. The leadership of Nordic nations, Israel, Switzerland, Netherlands and Australia can be explained by cultural attitude. Apparently, a positive trend is emerging in Latin America, where Chile improved its ranking in per capita productivity but Argentina, Costa Rica, Uruguay, Brazil and Cuba fell. Nevertheless, the most productive countries in total number of papers are Brazil, Mexico and Argentina: large countries with a long tradition of funding scientific research.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17354441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Biol Trop        ISSN: 0034-7744            Impact factor:   0.723


  3 in total

Review 1.  Disadvantages of publishing biomedical research articles in English for non-native speakers of English.

Authors:  Mohsen Rezaeian
Journal:  Epidemiol Health       Date:  2015-05-01

2.  Worldwide inequality in production of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Arsia Jamali; Saharnaz Nedjat; Kazem Heidari; Raika Jamali; Kiana Hassanpour; Sima Nedjat; Pasha Anvari; Reza Majdzadeh
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2015-12-27

3.  A Comparative Study of Scientific Publications in Health Care Sciences and Services from Mainland China, Taiwan, Japan, and India (2007-2014).

Authors:  Yipeng Lv; Bihan Tang; Xu Liu; Chen Xue; Yuan Liu; Peng Kang; Lulu Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.