BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has recently been developed for one-piece resection of gastric tumors. In order to improve patients' quality of life, it may be desirable to use the same technique for rectal tumors. METHODS: 35 consecutive patients with rectal tumors were enrolled. ESD was carried out using the same technique as for the stomach. The efficacy, technical feasibility, operation time, complications, and follow-up results were assessed. RESULTS: The mean size of the epithelial tumors was 26.2 +/- 14.0 mm, and the rates of one-piece resection and one-piece resection with tumor-free margins were 73.3% (22 of 30) and 70.0% (21 of 30), respectively. The median operation time was 70 min (range 8-360 min). All five carcinoid tumors were completely resected. No patient needed blood transfusion or had the complication of problematic bleeding. Perforation during ESD occurred in one patient (2.9%), who was managed with conservative medical treatment after endoscopic closure of the perforation. Excluding seven patients, who either underwent additional surgery or whose follow-up period was less than 1 year, all 23 patients with epithelial tumors were free of recurrence during a mean follow-up period of 25.7 months (range 12-53 months). CONCLUSIONS: ESD was thus found to be feasible for the treatment of rectal tumors, with promising results although the follow-up periods were short. ESD may therefore be indicated for rectal tumors which are not resectable en bloc by conventional procedures, in order to improve the patients' quality of life.
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has recently been developed for one-piece resection of gastric tumors. In order to improve patients' quality of life, it may be desirable to use the same technique for rectal tumors. METHODS: 35 consecutive patients with rectal tumors were enrolled. ESD was carried out using the same technique as for the stomach. The efficacy, technical feasibility, operation time, complications, and follow-up results were assessed. RESULTS: The mean size of the epithelial tumors was 26.2 +/- 14.0 mm, and the rates of one-piece resection and one-piece resection with tumor-free margins were 73.3% (22 of 30) and 70.0% (21 of 30), respectively. The median operation time was 70 min (range 8-360 min). All five carcinoid tumors were completely resected. No patient needed blood transfusion or had the complication of problematic bleeding. Perforation during ESD occurred in one patient (2.9%), who was managed with conservative medical treatment after endoscopic closure of the perforation. Excluding seven patients, who either underwent additional surgery or whose follow-up period was less than 1 year, all 23 patients with epithelial tumors were free of recurrence during a mean follow-up period of 25.7 months (range 12-53 months). CONCLUSIONS: ESD was thus found to be feasible for the treatment of rectal tumors, with promising results although the follow-up periods were short. ESD may therefore be indicated for rectal tumors which are not resectable en bloc by conventional procedures, in order to improve the patients' quality of life.
Authors: Miguel A Tanimoto; M Lourdes Guerrero; Yoshinori Morita; Jonathan Aguirre-Valadez; Elisa Gomez; Carlos Moctezuma-Velazquez; Jose A Estradas-Trujillo; Miguel A Valdovinos; Luis F Uscanga; Rikiya Fujita Journal: World J Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2015-04-16
Authors: Srinivas R Puli; Matthew L Bechtold; Jyotsna B K Reddy; Abhishek Choudhary; Mainor R Antillon Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2009-06-11 Impact factor: 3.199