BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of liver resection in patients with hepatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma and to identify selection criteria for patients suitable for resection. METHODS: Between January 1988 and March 2006, 31 patients underwent liver resection for metastases from renal cell carcinoma. Patients were identified from a prospective database and retrospectively reviewed. Patient, tumor, and operative parameters were analyzed for their influence on long-term survival. RESULTS: The overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 82.2%, 54.3%, and 38.9%, respectively. One patient was deceased and 4 developed complications during the postoperative course. In the univariate analysis, site of the primary tumor (P = 0.013), disease-free interval (P = 0.012), and resection margins (P = 0.008) showed significant influence on long-term survival. In the multivariate analysis, only the resection margins were identified as an independent prognostic factor after liver resection. CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection is effective and safe in the treatment of patients with hepatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma and offers the chance of long-term survival and cure. Achieving a margin-negative resection is the most important criterion in the selection of suitable patients for liver resection. However, the number of patients in the present study was small, and investigations of larger series may provide further prognostic parameters in these patients.
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of liver resection in patients with hepatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma and to identify selection criteria for patients suitable for resection. METHODS: Between January 1988 and March 2006, 31 patients underwent liver resection for metastases from renal cell carcinoma. Patients were identified from a prospective database and retrospectively reviewed. Patient, tumor, and operative parameters were analyzed for their influence on long-term survival. RESULTS: The overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 82.2%, 54.3%, and 38.9%, respectively. One patient was deceased and 4 developed complications during the postoperative course. In the univariate analysis, site of the primary tumor (P = 0.013), disease-free interval (P = 0.012), and resection margins (P = 0.008) showed significant influence on long-term survival. In the multivariate analysis, only the resection margins were identified as an independent prognostic factor after liver resection. CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection is effective and safe in the treatment of patients with hepatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma and offers the chance of long-term survival and cure. Achieving a margin-negative resection is the most important criterion in the selection of suitable patients for liver resection. However, the number of patients in the present study was small, and investigations of larger series may provide further prognostic parameters in these patients.
Authors: Michael D Staehler; Jessica Kruse; Nicolas Haseke; Thomas Stadler; Alexander Roosen; Alexander Karl; Christian G Stief; Karl W Jauch; Christiane J Bruns Journal: World J Urol Date: 2010-05-04 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Javier Puente Vázquez; T Alonso Gordoa; J Moreno; L Poma; E Diaz Rubio; A Gomez; J Blazquez; J L Gonzalez Larriba Journal: Curr Treat Options Oncol Date: 2015-03
Authors: Ioannis Hatzaras; Ana L Gleisner; Carlo Pulitano; Charbel Sandroussi; Kenzo Hirose; Omar Hyder; Christopher L Wolfgang; Luca Aldrighetti; Michael Crawford; Michael A Choti; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Axel Heidenreich; Stefan Wilop; Michael Pinkawa; Daniel Porres; David Pfister Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2012-09-28 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Christopher D Jakubowski; Emily A Vertosick; Brian R Untch; Daniel Sjoberg; Elizabeth Wei; Frank L Palmer; Snehal G Patel; Robert J Downey; Vivian E Strong; Paul Russo Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 3.454