PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent bortezomib in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Symptomatic WM patients, untreated or previously treated, received bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 intravenously days 1, 4, 8, and 11 on a 21-day cycle until two cycles past complete response (CR), stable disease (SD) attained, progression (PD), or unacceptable toxicity. Responses were based on both paraprotein levels and bidimensional disease measurements. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled. A median of six cycles (range, two to 39) of bortezomib were administered. Twenty-one patients had a decrease in immunoglobulin M (IgM) of at least 25%, with 12 patients (44%) reaching at least 50% IgM reduction. Using both IgM and bidimensional criteria, responses included seven partial responses (PRs; 26%), 19 SDs (70%), and one PD (4%). Total response rate was 26%. IgM reductions were prompt, with nodal responses lagging. Hemoglobin levels increased by at least 10 g/L in 18 patients (66%). Most nonhematologic toxicities were grade 1 to 2, but 20 patients (74%) developed new or worsening peripheral neuropathy (five patients with grade 3, no grade 4), a common cause for dose reduction. Onset of neuropathy was within two to four cycles and reversible in the majority. Hematologic toxicities included grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia in eight patients (29.6%) and neutropenia in five (19%). Toxicity led to treatment discontinuation in 12 patients (44%), most commonly because of neuropathy. CONCLUSION: Bortezomib has efficacy in WM, but neurotoxicity can be dose limiting. The slower response in nodal disease may require prolonged therapy, perhaps with a less intensive dosing schedule to avoid early discontinuation because of toxicity. Future studies of bortezomib in combination with other agents are warranted.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent bortezomib in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Symptomatic WM patients, untreated or previously treated, received bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 intravenously days 1, 4, 8, and 11 on a 21-day cycle until two cycles past complete response (CR), stable disease (SD) attained, progression (PD), or unacceptable toxicity. Responses were based on both paraprotein levels and bidimensional disease measurements. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled. A median of six cycles (range, two to 39) of bortezomib were administered. Twenty-one patients had a decrease in immunoglobulin M (IgM) of at least 25%, with 12 patients (44%) reaching at least 50% IgM reduction. Using both IgM and bidimensional criteria, responses included seven partial responses (PRs; 26%), 19 SDs (70%), and one PD (4%). Total response rate was 26%. IgM reductions were prompt, with nodal responses lagging. Hemoglobin levels increased by at least 10 g/L in 18 patients (66%). Most nonhematologic toxicities were grade 1 to 2, but 20 patients (74%) developed new or worsening peripheral neuropathy (five patients with grade 3, no grade 4), a common cause for dose reduction. Onset of neuropathy was within two to four cycles and reversible in the majority. Hematologic toxicities included grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia in eight patients (29.6%) and neutropenia in five (19%). Toxicity led to treatment discontinuation in 12 patients (44%), most commonly because of neuropathy. CONCLUSION:Bortezomib has efficacy in WM, but neurotoxicity can be dose limiting. The slower response in nodal disease may require prolonged therapy, perhaps with a less intensive dosing schedule to avoid early discontinuation because of toxicity. Future studies of bortezomib in combination with other agents are warranted.
Authors: Sigurdur Y Kristinsson; Sandra Eloranta; Paul W Dickman; Therese M-L Andersson; Ingemar Turesson; Ola Landgren; Magnus Björkholm Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2012-11-19 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: Manuel Valdivieso; Benjamin W Corn; Janet E Dancey; D Lawrence Wickerham; L Elise Horvath; Edith A Perez; Alison Urton; Walter M Cronin; Erica Field; Evonne Lackey; Charles D Blanke Journal: Semin Oncol Date: 2015-07-10 Impact factor: 4.929
Authors: Isere Kuiatse; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani; Heather Y Lin; Sheeba K Thomas; Chad C Bjorklund; Donna M Weber; Michael Wang; Jatin J Shah; Xing-Ding Zhang; Richard J Jones; Stephen M Ansell; Guang Yang; Steven P Treon; Robert Z Orlowski Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Esteban Braggio; Jonathan J Keats; Xavier Leleu; Scott Van Wier; Victor H Jimenez-Zepeda; Riccardo Valdez; Roelandt F J Schop; Tammy Price-Troska; Kimberly Henderson; Antonio Sacco; Feda Azab; Philip Greipp; Morie Gertz; Suzanne Hayman; S Vincent Rajkumar; John Carpten; Marta Chesi; Michael Barrett; A Keith Stewart; Ahmet Dogan; P Leif Bergsagel; Irene M Ghobrial; Rafael Fonseca Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-04-07 Impact factor: 12.701