BACKGROUND: The outcome of resuscitated patients after cardiac arrest complicating acute myocardial infarction remains poor, primarily because of the relatively low success rates of cardiopulmonary resuscitation management. Existing data suggest potential beneficial effects of early myocardial reperfusion, but the predictors of survival in these patients remain unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: From 1995 to 2005, 186 patients (78% men; mean age, 60.4+/-13.8 years) underwent immediate percutaneous coronary intervention after successful resuscitation for cardiac arrest complicating acute myocardial infarction. Prompt prehospital management was performed by mobile medical care units in 154 of 186 patients, whereas 32 had in-hospital cardiac arrest. Infarct location was anterior in 105 patients (56%), and shock was present on admission in 96 (52%). Percutaneous coronary intervention (stenting rate 90%) was successful in 161 of 186 patients (87%). Six-month survival rate was 100 of 186 (54%), and 6-month survival free of neurological sequelae was 46%. By multivariate analysis, predictors of 6-month survival were a shorter interval between the onset of cardiac arrest and arrival of a first responder (odds ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.84), a shorter interval between the onset of cardiac arrest and return of spontaneous circulation (odds ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.96), and absence of diabetes (odds ratio, 7.30; 95% CI, 1.80 to 29.41). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with resuscitated cardiac arrest complicating acute myocardial infarction, prompt prehospital management and early revascularization were associated with a 54% survival rate at 6 months. A strategy including adequate prehospital management, early revascularization, and specific care in dedicated intensive care units should be strongly considered in resuscitated patients after cardiac arrest complicating acute myocardial infarction.
BACKGROUND: The outcome of resuscitated patients after cardiac arrest complicating acute myocardial infarction remains poor, primarily because of the relatively low success rates of cardiopulmonary resuscitation management. Existing data suggest potential beneficial effects of early myocardial reperfusion, but the predictors of survival in these patients remain unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: From 1995 to 2005, 186 patients (78% men; mean age, 60.4+/-13.8 years) underwent immediate percutaneous coronary intervention after successful resuscitation for cardiac arrest complicating acute myocardial infarction. Prompt prehospital management was performed by mobile medical care units in 154 of 186 patients, whereas 32 had in-hospital cardiac arrest. Infarct location was anterior in 105 patients (56%), and shock was present on admission in 96 (52%). Percutaneous coronary intervention (stenting rate 90%) was successful in 161 of 186 patients (87%). Six-month survival rate was 100 of 186 (54%), and 6-month survival free of neurological sequelae was 46%. By multivariate analysis, predictors of 6-month survival were a shorter interval between the onset of cardiac arrest and arrival of a first responder (odds ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.84), a shorter interval between the onset of cardiac arrest and return of spontaneous circulation (odds ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.96), and absence of diabetes (odds ratio, 7.30; 95% CI, 1.80 to 29.41). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with resuscitated cardiac arrest complicating acute myocardial infarction, prompt prehospital management and early revascularization were associated with a 54% survival rate at 6 months. A strategy including adequate prehospital management, early revascularization, and specific care in dedicated intensive care units should be strongly considered in resuscitated patients after cardiac arrest complicating acute myocardial infarction.
Authors: Hubertus von Korn; Victor Stefan; Reyn van Ewijk; Kamalesh Chakraborty; Burkhard Sanwald; Jan Hemker; Ulrich Hink; Marc Ohlow; Bernward Lauer; Dierk Vagts; Stefan Gruene; Thomas Münzel Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2016-06-08 Impact factor: 3.397
Authors: Jürgen Leick; Christoph Liebetrau; Sebastian Szardien; Ulrich Fischer-Rasokat; Matthias Willmer; Arnaud van Linden; Johannes Blumenstein; Holger Nef; Andreas Rolf; Matthias Arlt; Thomas Walther; Christian Hamm; Helge Möllmann Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: V Wenzel; S G Russo; H R Arntz; J Bahr; M A Baubin; B W Böttiger; B Dirks; U Kreimeier; M Fries; C Eich Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 1.041
Authors: Justin A Strote; Charles Maynard; Michele Olsufka; Graham Nichol; Michael K Copass; Leonard A Cobb; Francis Kim Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2011-11-17 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Matthew W Sherwood; J Matthew Brennan; Kalon K Ho; Frederick A Masoudi; John C Messenger; W Douglas Weaver; David Dai; Eric D Peterson Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Raina M Merchant; Benjamin S Abella; Monica Khan; Kuang-Ning Huang; David G Beiser; Robert W Neumar; Brendan G Carr; Lance B Becker; Terry L Vanden Hoek Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2008-10-31 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Clifton W Callaway; Robert Schmicker; Mitch Kampmeyer; Judy Powell; Tom D Rea; Mohamud R Daya; Thomas P Aufderheide; Daniel P Davis; Jon C Rittenberger; Ahamed H Idris; Graham Nichol Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2010-01-13 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Joshua C Reynolds; Clifton W Callaway; Samar R El Khoudary; Charity G Moore; René J Alvarez; Jon C Rittenberger Journal: J Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-03-25 Impact factor: 3.510