BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although the cerebellum has not attracted the same degree of attention as cortical areas and the hippocampus in traumatic brain injury (TBI) literature, there is limited structural and functional imaging evidence that the cerebellum is also vulnerable to insult. The cerebellum is emerging as part of a frontocerebellar system that, when disrupted, results in significant cognitive and behavioral consequences. We hypothesized that cerebellar volume would be reduced in children following TBI and wished to examine the relation between the cerebellum and known sites of projection, including the prefrontal cortex, thalamus, and pons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Quantitative MR imaging was used to measure cerebellar white and gray matter and lesion volumes 1-10 years following TBI in 16 children 9-16 years of age and 16 demographically matched typically developing children 9-16 years of age. Cerebellar volumes were also compared with volumetric data from other brain regions to which the cerebellum projects. RESULTS: A significant group difference was found in cerebellar white and gray matter volume, with children in the TBI group consistently exhibiting smaller volumes. Repeating the analysis after excluding children with focal cerebellar lesions revealed that significant group differences still remained for cerebellar white matter (WM). We also found a relation between the cerebellum and projection areas, including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, thalamus, and pons in 1 or both groups. CONCLUSION: Our finding of reduced cerebellar WM volume in children with TBI is consistent with evidence from experimental studies suggesting that the cerebellum and its related projection areas are highly vulnerable to fiber degeneration following traumatic insult.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although the cerebellum has not attracted the same degree of attention as cortical areas and the hippocampus in traumatic brain injury (TBI) literature, there is limited structural and functional imaging evidence that the cerebellum is also vulnerable to insult. The cerebellum is emerging as part of a frontocerebellar system that, when disrupted, results in significant cognitive and behavioral consequences. We hypothesized that cerebellar volume would be reduced in children following TBI and wished to examine the relation between the cerebellum and known sites of projection, including the prefrontal cortex, thalamus, and pons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Quantitative MR imaging was used to measure cerebellar white and gray matter and lesion volumes 1-10 years following TBI in 16 children 9-16 years of age and 16 demographically matched typically developing children 9-16 years of age. Cerebellar volumes were also compared with volumetric data from other brain regions to which the cerebellum projects. RESULTS: A significant group difference was found in cerebellar white and gray matter volume, with children in the TBI group consistently exhibiting smaller volumes. Repeating the analysis after excluding children with focal cerebellar lesions revealed that significant group differences still remained for cerebellar white matter (WM). We also found a relation between the cerebellum and projection areas, including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, thalamus, and pons in 1 or both groups. CONCLUSION: Our finding of reduced cerebellar WM volume in children with TBI is consistent with evidence from experimental studies suggesting that the cerebellum and its related projection areas are highly vulnerable to fiber degeneration following traumatic insult.
Authors: D D Blatter; E D Bigler; S D Gale; S C Johnson; C V Anderson; B M Burnett; N Parker; S Kurth; S D Horn Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: A Pierallini; P Pantano; L M Fantozzi; M Bonamini; R Vichi; R Zylberman; F Pisarri; C Colonnese; L Bozzao Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Elisabeth A Wilde; Jill V Hunter; Mary R Newsome; Randall S Scheibel; Erin D Bigler; Jamie L Johnson; Michael A Fearing; Howard B Cleavinger; Xiaoqi Li; Paul R Swank; Claudia Pedroza; Garland Stallings Roberson; Jocelyne Bachevalier; Harvey S Levin Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Karen A Tong; Stephen Ashwal; Barbara A Holshouser; Joshua P Nickerson; Christopher J Wall; Lori A Shutter; Renatta J Osterdock; E M Haacke; Daniel Kido Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Erin D Bigler; Tracy J Abildskov; Jo Ann Petrie; Michael Johnson; Nicholas Lange; Jonathan Chipman; Jeffrey Lu; William McMahon; Janet E Lainhart Journal: Dev Neuropsychol Date: 2010 Impact factor: 2.253
Authors: Karen Caeyenberghs; Alexander Leemans; Monique Geurts; Tom Taymans; Catharine Vander Linden; Bouwien C M Smits-Engelsman; Stefan Sunaert; Stephan P Swinnen Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Nicholas P Ryan; Cathy Catroppa; Richard Beare; Timothy J Silk; Louise Crossley; Miriam H Beauchamp; Keith Owen Yeates; Vicki A Anderson Journal: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 3.436