Literature DB >> 17353251

Single-dose oral amoxicillin or linezolid for prophylaxis of experimental endocarditis due to vancomycin-susceptible and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis.

Philippe Moreillon1, Walter R Wilson, Roland Leclercq, José M Entenza.   

Abstract

Endocarditis prophylaxis following genitourinary or gastrointestinal procedures targets Enterococcus faecalis. Prophylaxis recommendations advocate oral amoxicillin (2 g in the United States and 3 g in the United Kingdom) in moderate-risk patients and intravenous amoxicillin (2 g) or vancomycin (1 g) plus gentamicin in high-risk patients. While ampicillin-resistant (or amoxicillin-resistant) E. faecalis is still rare, there is a concern that these regimens might fail against vancomycin-resistant and/or aminoglycoside-resistant isolates. The present study tested oral linezolid as an alternative. Rats with catheter-induced aortic vegetations were given prophylaxis simulating human pharmacokinetics of oral amoxicillin (2- to 3-g single dose), oral linezolid (600 mg, single or multiple oral doses every 12 h), or intravenous vancomycin (1-g single dose). Rats were then inoculated with the minimum inoculum infecting 90% of the animals (90% infective dose [ID(90)]) or with 10 times the ID(90) of the vancomycin-susceptible E. faecalis strain JH2-2 or the vancomycin-resistant (VanA phenotype) E. faecalis strain UCN41. Amoxicillin was also tested with two additional vancomycin-susceptible E. faecalis strains, 309 and 1209. Animals were sacrificed 3 days later. All the tested bacteria were susceptible to amoxicillin and gentamicin. Single-dose amoxicillin provided 100% protection against all four isolates at both the ID(90) and 10 times the ID(90). In contrast, linezolid required up to four consecutive doses to provide full protection against the vancomycin-resistant isolate. Vancomycin protected only against the vancomycin-susceptible strain. The high efficacy of single-dose oral amoxicillin suggests that this regimen could be used for prophylaxis in both moderate-risk and high-risk patients without additional aminoglycosides. Linezolid appears to be less reliable, at least against the vancomycin-resistant strain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17353251      PMCID: PMC1855552          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00744-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  47 in total

1.  In vitro antibacterial activities of platelet microbicidal protein and neutrophil defensin against Staphylococcus aureus are influenced by antibiotics differing in mechanism of action.

Authors:  Y Q Xiong; M R Yeaman; A S Bayer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Levofloxacin versus ciprofloxacin, flucloxacillin, or vancomycin for treatment of experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-susceptible or -resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J M Entenza; J Vouillamoz; M P Glauser; P Moreillon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  The role of platelets in antimicrobial host defense.

Authors:  M R Yeaman
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  In vivo antibacterial effects of simulated human serum profiles of once-daily versus thrice-daily dosing of amikacin in a Serratia marcescens endocarditis experimental model.

Authors:  D Bugnon; G Potel; Y Q Xiong; J Caillon; M F Kergueris; P Le Conte; D Baron; H Drugeon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  In vivo simulation of human pharmacokinetics in the rabbit.

Authors:  D Bugnon; G Potel; J Caillon; D Baron; H B Drugeon; P Feigel; M F Kergueris
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.758

6.  Role of amoxicillin serum levels for successful prophylaxis of experimental endocarditis due to tolerant streptococci.

Authors:  U Fluckiger; P Francioli; J Blaser; M P Glauser; P Moreillon
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men.

Authors:  W A Craig
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Prevention of bacterial endocarditis: recommendations by the American Heart Association.

Authors:  A S Dajani; K A Taubert; W Wilson; A F Bolger; A Bayer; P Ferrieri; M H Gewitz; S T Shulman; S Nouri; J W Newburger; C Hutto; T J Pallasch; T W Gage; M E Levison; G Peter; G Zuccaro
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Efficacy of clarithromycin versus that of clindamycin for single-dose prophylaxis of experimental streptococcal endocarditis.

Authors:  D Vermot; J M Entenza; J Vouillamoz; M P Glauser; P Moreillon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Involvement of bactericidal factors from thrombin-stimulated platelets in clearance of adherent viridans streptococci in experimental infective endocarditis.

Authors:  J Dankert; J van der Werff; S A Zaat; W Joldersma; D Klein; J Hess
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  1 in total

1.  Dose Optimization of Combined Linezolid and Fosfomycin against Enterococcus by Using an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model.

Authors:  Jun Mao; Ting Li; Na Zhang; Shuaishuai Wang; Yaowen Li; Yu Peng; Huiping Liu; Guang Yang; Yisong Yan; Lifang Jiang; Yanyan Liu; Jiabin Li; Xiaohui Huang
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-12-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.