BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) is a common opportunistic infection among HIV-infected people, and rifampicin is an important drug for the treatment of TB. However, administration of rifampicin in combination with antiretroviral therapy, particularly protease inhibitors, is difficult because of drug-drug interactions. METHODS: We have performed a prospective study in three HIV-infected patients with TB treated with a rifampicin-containing regimen (rifampicin 600 mg per day) and antiretroviral therapy including only nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus atazanavir 300 mg once a day (qd) and ritonavir 100 mg qd, to evaluate whether the inducing effect of rifampicin on the drug-metabolizing enzyme cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 could be overcome by the inhibitory effect of ritonavir. A complete pharmacokinetic evaluation of the steady-state concentrations of atazanavir and ritonavir was performed. RESULTS: In all three cases, more than 50% of the time the atazanavir level was below the minimum recommended trough plasma level (150 ng/mL according to current pharmacokinetic guidelines) to inhibit HIV wild-type replication. CONCLUSION: These results strongly indicate that the administration of rifampicin with a combination of atazanavir 300 mg qd plus ritonavir 100 mg qd must be avoided because subtherapeutic concentrations of atazanavir are produced.
BACKGROUND:Tuberculosis (TB) is a common opportunistic infection among HIV-infected people, and rifampicin is an important drug for the treatment of TB. However, administration of rifampicin in combination with antiretroviral therapy, particularly protease inhibitors, is difficult because of drug-drug interactions. METHODS: We have performed a prospective study in three HIV-infectedpatients with TB treated with a rifampicin-containing regimen (rifampicin 600 mg per day) and antiretroviral therapy including only nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus atazanavir 300 mg once a day (qd) and ritonavir 100 mg qd, to evaluate whether the inducing effect of rifampicin on the drug-metabolizing enzyme cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 could be overcome by the inhibitory effect of ritonavir. A complete pharmacokinetic evaluation of the steady-state concentrations of atazanavir and ritonavir was performed. RESULTS: In all three cases, more than 50% of the time the atazanavir level was below the minimum recommended trough plasma level (150 ng/mL according to current pharmacokinetic guidelines) to inhibit HIV wild-type replication. CONCLUSION: These results strongly indicate that the administration of rifampicin with a combination of atazanavir 300 mg qd plus ritonavir 100 mg qd must be avoided because subtherapeutic concentrations of atazanavir are produced.
Authors: M C Hosseinipour; J J Kumwenda; R Weigel; L B Brown; D Mzinganjira; B Mhango; J J Eron; S Phiri; J J van Oosterhout Journal: HIV Med Date: 2010-03-19 Impact factor: 3.180
Authors: Tanuja N Gengiah; Andrew L Gray; Kogieleum Naidoo; Quarraisha Abdool Karim Journal: Expert Opin Drug Saf Date: 2011-01-05 Impact factor: 4.250
Authors: Bryan E Shepherd; Cathy A Jenkins; Deidra D Parrish; Tracy R Glass; Angela Cescon; Angels Masabeu; Genevieve Chene; Frank de Wolf; Heidi M Crane; Inma Jarrin; John Gill; Julia del Amo; Sophie Abgrall; Pavel Khaykin; Clara Lehmann; Suzanne M Ingle; Margaret T May; Jonathan A C Sterne; Timothy R Sterling Journal: AIDS Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 4.177