Literature DB >> 17352598

The central role of entitativity in stereotypes of social categories and task groups.

Julie Spencer-Rodgers1, David L Hamilton, Steven J Sherman.   

Abstract

Research indicates that people's intuitive beliefs about groups are organized according to a group typology (B. Lickel, D. L. Hamilton, & S. J. Sherman, 2001). In Study 1, the authors compared and contrasted people's spontaneous cognitive representations of two group types, task groups and social categories. Analyses revealed significant differences as well as commonalities in people's beliefs about the group types. Notably, perceivers used more abstract, enduring language and contextually rich descriptors when characterizing social categories than when describing task groups. In Study 2, the authors investigated the differential roles of distinct group perception variables (entitativity, homogeneity, essence, role differentiation, and agency) as predictors of stereotyping for the different group types. Entitativity and all of the group perception variables significantly predicted stereotyping for both social categories and task groups. However, perceptions of entitativity mediated the association between the group perception variables and stereotypic judgments. These findings demonstrate that laypeople hold stereotype-like mental representations of group types other than social categories and that entitativity plays a crucial mediating role in stereotyping across different types of groups. 2007 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17352598     DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  10 in total

1.  The influence of category coherence on inference about cross-classified entities.

Authors:  Andrea L Patalano; Steven M Wengrovitz; Kirsten M Sharpes
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-01

2.  Ratings of Essentialism for Eight Religious Identities.

Authors:  Negin R Toosi; Nalini Ambady
Journal:  Int J Psychol Relig       Date:  2011

3.  Striving for group agency: threat to personal control increases the attractiveness of agentic groups.

Authors:  Janine Stollberg; Immo Fritsche; Anna Bäcker
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-27

4.  The Dark Side of Malleability: Incremental Theory Promotes Immoral Behaviors.

Authors:  Niwen Huang; Shijiang Zuo; Fang Wang; Pan Cai; Fengxiang Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-07

5.  Left Threatened by Right: Political Intergroup Bias in the Contemporary Italian Context.

Authors:  Michael Schepisi; Giuseppina Porciello; Ilaria Bufalari; Salvatore Maria Aglioti; Maria Serena Panasiti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-01-24

6.  Paranoia and conspiracy: group cohesion increases harmful intent attribution in the Trust Game.

Authors:  Anna Greenburgh; Vaughan Bell; Nichola Raihani
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Environmental stress increases out-group aggression and intergroup conflict in humans.

Authors:  Carsten K W De Dreu; Jörg Gross; Lennart Reddmann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Tell Me Where You Live… How the Perceived Entitativity of Neighborhoods Determines the Formation of Impressions About Their Residents.

Authors:  Fátima Bernardo; José Manuel Palma-Oliveira
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-15

9.  Why we sometimes punish the innocent: The role of group entitativity in collective punishment.

Authors:  Andrea Pereira; Jan-Willem van Prooijen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Group meaningfulness and the causal direction of influence between the ingroup and the self or another individual: Evidence from the Induction-Deduction Paradigm.

Authors:  Mara Cadinu; Andrea Carnaghi; Francesca Guizzo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.