Literature DB >> 17352553

Memory plasticity across the life span: uncovering children's latent potential.

Yvonne Brehmer1, Shu-Chen Li, Viktor Müller, Timo von Oertzen, Ulman Lindenberger.   

Abstract

Memory plasticity, or the ability to improve one's memory performance through instruction and training, is known to decline during adulthood. However, direct comparisons among middle childhood, adulthood, and old age are lacking. The authors examined memory plasticity in an age-comparative multisession training study. One hundred and eight participants ages 9-10, 11-12, 20-25, and 65-78 years learned and practiced an imagery-based mnemonic technique to encode and retrieve words by location cues. Individuals of all ages were able to acquire and optimize use of the technique. Older adults and children showed similar baseline performance and improvement through mnemonic instruction. However, in line with tenets from life-span psychology (P. B. Baltes, 1987), children profited more from mnemonic practice and reached higher levels of final performance than did older adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17352553     DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychol        ISSN: 0012-1649


  48 in total

Review 1.  The two-component model of memory development, and its potential implications for educational settings.

Authors:  Myriam C Sander; Markus Werkle-Bergner; Peter Gerjets; Yee Lee Shing; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 6.464

Review 2.  Working memory and executive functions: effects of training on academic achievement.

Authors:  Cora Titz; Julia Karbach
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-01-04

3.  Adult age differences and the role of cognitive resources in perceptual-motor skill acquisition: application of a multilevel negative exponential model.

Authors:  Paolo Ghisletta; Kristen M Kennedy; Karen M Rodrigue; Ulman Lindenberger; Naftali Raz
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 4.  Cognitive training and plasticity: theoretical perspective and methodological consequences.

Authors:  Sherry L Willis; K Warner Schaie
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.406

5.  Assessment of age-related changes in cognitive functions using EmoCogMeter, a novel tablet-computer based approach.

Authors:  Philipp Fuge; Simone Grimm; Anne Weigand; Yan Fan; Matti Gärtner; Melanie Feeser; Malek Bajbouj
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Structural integrity of the corpus callosum predicts long-term transfer of fluid intelligence-related training gains in normal aging.

Authors:  Dominik Wolf; Florian Udo Fischer; Johanna Fesenbeckh; Igor Yakushev; Irene Maria Lelieveld; Armin Scheurich; Ingrid Schermuly; Lisa Zschutschke; Andreas Fellgiebel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  The method of loci as a mnemonic device to facilitate learning in endocrinology leads to improvement in student performance as measured by assessments.

Authors:  Ayisha Qureshi; Farwa Rizvi; Anjum Syed; Aqueel Shahid; Hana Manzoor
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.288

8.  Walking in high-risk settings: do older adults still prioritize gait when distracted by a cognitive task?

Authors:  Sabine Schaefer; Michael Schellenbach; Ulman Lindenberger; Marjorie Woollacott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Plasticity of brain and cognition in older adults.

Authors:  Yvonne Brehmer; Grégoria Kalpouzos; Elisabeth Wenger; Martin Lövdén
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-09-28

10.  Developmental change and intraindividual variability: relating cognitive aging to cognitive plasticity, cardiovascular lability, and emotional diversity.

Authors:  Nilam Ram; Denis Gerstorf; Ulman Lindenberger; Jacqui Smith
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.