BACKGROUND: The use of 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA) drugs in Crohn's disease (CD) is controversial, with their continuing apparent widespread use despite high-level evidence indicating marginal benefit at best and international guidelines recommending limited indications. METHODS: In order to understand how clinicians translate the evidence base into clinical practice, we surveyed a cross-section of Australian gastroenterologists to determine opinions and prescribing patterns of 5-ASA drugs in CD. RESULTS: In all, 42% of 285 gastroenterologists who were sent a questionnaire by e-mail responded. Five (4%) never use 5-ASA drugs in CD. The drugs are most commonly prescribed for patients with colonic (96%) or ileocolonic (92%) disease location, inflammatory disease behavior (80%), and mild disease activity (97%). The majority (64%) use a dose of 1-3 g/day, but only 6% use over 4.5 g/day. Less than one-half use 5-ASA drugs as maintenance following surgical resection, but most use it for inducing remission alone (70%) or in combination with other drugs (90%), and continue its use for maintenance. Side effects are thought to be infrequent (62%) or rare (20%) and few common side effects are believed to be serious. Respondents estimated that over 90% of patients were nonadherent to prescribed 5-ASA regimens at least 50% of the time. While 84% believed that 5-ASA drugs were effective in CD, only 58% believed that they were cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: In Australia 5-ASA drugs are extensively prescribed for CD at relatively low doses without expectation of patient adherence. Current evidence and guidelines has had little apparent impact on clinical practice. The cost implications are considerable.
BACKGROUND: The use of 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA) drugs in Crohn's disease (CD) is controversial, with their continuing apparent widespread use despite high-level evidence indicating marginal benefit at best and international guidelines recommending limited indications. METHODS: In order to understand how clinicians translate the evidence base into clinical practice, we surveyed a cross-section of Australian gastroenterologists to determine opinions and prescribing patterns of 5-ASA drugs in CD. RESULTS: In all, 42% of 285 gastroenterologists who were sent a questionnaire by e-mail responded. Five (4%) never use 5-ASA drugs in CD. The drugs are most commonly prescribed for patients with colonic (96%) or ileocolonic (92%) disease location, inflammatory disease behavior (80%), and mild disease activity (97%). The majority (64%) use a dose of 1-3 g/day, but only 6% use over 4.5 g/day. Less than one-half use 5-ASA drugs as maintenance following surgical resection, but most use it for inducing remission alone (70%) or in combination with other drugs (90%), and continue its use for maintenance. Side effects are thought to be infrequent (62%) or rare (20%) and few common side effects are believed to be serious. Respondents estimated that over 90% of patients were nonadherent to prescribed 5-ASA regimens at least 50% of the time. While 84% believed that 5-ASA drugs were effective in CD, only 58% believed that they were cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: In Australia 5-ASA drugs are extensively prescribed for CD at relatively low doses without expectation of patient adherence. Current evidence and guidelines has had little apparent impact on clinical practice. The cost implications are considerable.
Authors: Johan Burisch; Daniel Bergemalm; Jonas Halfvarson; Viktor Domislovic; Zeljko Krznaric; Adrian Goldis; Jens F Dahlerup; Pia Oksanen; Pekka Collin; Luisa de Castro; Vicent Hernandez; Svetlana Turcan; Elena Belousova; Renata D'Incà; Alessandro Sartini; Daniela Valpiani; Martina Giannotta; Ravi Misra; Naila Arebi; Dana Duricova; Martin Bortlik; Kelly Gatt; Pierre Ellul; Natalia Pedersen; Jens Kjeldsen; Karina W Andersen; Vibeke Andersen; Konstantinos H Katsanos; Dimitrios K Christodoulou; Shaji Sebastian; Luisa Barros; Fernando Magro; Jóngerð Mm Midjord; Kári R Nielsen; Riina Salupere; Hendrika Al Kievit; Gediminas Kiudelis; Juozas Kupčinskas; Mathurin Fumery; Corinne Gower-Rousseau; Ioannis P Kaimakliotis; Doron Schwartz; Selwyn Odes; Laszlo Lakatos; Peter L Lakatos; Ebbe Langholz; Pia Munkholm Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2020-07-26 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Balakrishnan S Ramakrishna; Govind K Makharia; Vineet Ahuja; Uday C Ghoshal; Venkataraman Jayanthi; Benjamin Perakath; Philip Abraham; Deepak K Bhasin; Shobna J Bhatia; Gourdas Choudhuri; Sunil Dadhich; Devendra Desai; Bhaba Dev Goswami; Sanjeev K Issar; Ajay K Jain; Rakesh Kochhar; Goundappa Loganathan; Sri Prakash Misra; C Ganesh Pai; Sujoy Pal; Mathew Philip; Anna Pulimood; Amarender S Puri; Gautam Ray; Shivaram P Singh; Ajit Sood; Venkatraman Subramanian Journal: Indian J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-03-14
Authors: Lea I Kredel; Oliver Schneidereit; Jörg C Hoffmann; Britta Siegmund; Jan C Preiß Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Ryan C Ungaro; Berkeley N Limketkai; Camilla Bjørn Jensen; Clara Yzet; Kristine H Allin; Manasi Agrawal; Thomas Ullman; Johan Burisch; Tine Jess; Jean-Frederic Colombel Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2019-08-13 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Mohamed Noureldin; Shirley Cohen-Mekelburg; Asadullah Mahmood; Ryan Stidham; Peter D R Higgins; Shail Govani; Amar R Deshpande; Akbar K Waljee Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2021-03-15 Impact factor: 5.325