BACKGROUND: Elevation of fatty acid synthase (FAS) in human cancers is often associated with increased tumor aggression. The basic genetic mechanisms leading to increased enzyme content in cancer cells were investigated using cell lines derived from human metastatic breast carcinomas (T47D, Zr75 and SKBr3) and normal human breast epithelium (184A1). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Western analysis, Northern blotting, [2-(14)C]malonyl-CoA incorporation assays, nuclear run-off transcription assays, mRNA decay assays, and poly(A) tail assays were used to measure and compare transcription rates of the FAS gene among the four cell lines. RESULTS: By Western analysis, FAS levels in T47D were 2.6 times lower than ZR75 and SKBr3, but 6.7 times greater than non-neoplastic 184A1 cells. FAS mRNA levels and specific activity correlated with protein content. In contrast, relative rates of FAS gene transcription were significantly higher in non-neoplastic 184A1 cells than T47D, ZR75 and SKBr3. Stability of message was investigated to explain this discrepancy. The half-life of FAS mRNA in 184A1 cells was 5.6 h, or 4-5-fold less than ZR75 and SKBr3. Poly(A) tail assays showed that FAS mRNA species from 184A1 cells tended to be longer than those of breast cancer cell lines (500-1500 nt versus 500-800 nt, respectively). CONCLUSION: Breast cancer cell lines contained significantly more FAS enzyme, message and activity than non-neoplastic 184A1 cells. Yet, 184A1 cells exhibited higher rates
BACKGROUND: Elevation of fatty acid synthase (FAS) in humancancers is often associated with increased tumor aggression. The basic genetic mechanisms leading to increased enzyme content in cancer cells were investigated using cell lines derived from human metastatic breast carcinomas (T47D, Zr75 and SKBr3) and normal human breast epithelium (184A1). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Western analysis, Northern blotting, [2-(14)C]malonyl-CoA incorporation assays, nuclear run-off transcription assays, mRNA decay assays, and poly(A) tail assays were used to measure and compare transcription rates of the FAS gene among the four cell lines. RESULTS: By Western analysis, FAS levels in T47D were 2.6 times lower than ZR75 and SKBr3, but 6.7 times greater than non-neoplastic 184A1 cells. FAS mRNA levels and specific activity correlated with protein content. In contrast, relative rates of FAS gene transcription were significantly higher in non-neoplastic 184A1 cells than T47D, ZR75 and SKBr3. Stability of message was investigated to explain this discrepancy. The half-life of FAS mRNA in 184A1 cells was 5.6 h, or 4-5-fold less than ZR75 and SKBr3. Poly(A) tail assays showed that FAS mRNA species from 184A1 cells tended to be longer than those of breast cancer cell lines (500-1500 nt versus 500-800 nt, respectively). CONCLUSION:Breast cancer cell lines contained significantly more FAS enzyme, message and activity than non-neoplastic 184A1 cells. Yet, 184A1 cells exhibited higher rates
Authors: Bryan He; Ludvig Bergenstråhle; Linnea Stenbeck; Abubakar Abid; Alma Andersson; Åke Borg; Jonas Maaskola; Joakim Lundeberg; James Zou Journal: Nat Biomed Eng Date: 2020-06-22 Impact factor: 25.671
Authors: Ulrike Bruning; Francisco Morales-Rodriguez; Joanna Kalucka; Jermaine Goveia; Federico Taverna; Karla C S Queiroz; Charlotte Dubois; Anna Rita Cantelmo; Rongyuan Chen; Stefan Loroch; Evy Timmerman; Vanessa Caixeta; Katarzyna Bloch; Lena-Christin Conradi; Lucas Treps; An Staes; Kris Gevaert; Andrew Tee; Mieke Dewerchin; Clay F Semenkovich; Francis Impens; Birgit Schilling; Eric Verdin; Johannes V Swinnen; Jordan L Meier; Rhushikesh A Kulkarni; Albert Sickmann; Bart Ghesquière; Luc Schoonjans; Xuri Li; Massimiliano Mazzone; Peter Carmeliet Journal: Cell Metab Date: 2018-08-23 Impact factor: 27.287
Authors: Mindy I Davis; Rajan Pragani; Jennifer T Fox; Min Shen; Kalindi Parmar; Emily F Gaudiano; Li Liu; Cordelle Tanega; Lauren McGee; Matthew D Hall; Crystal McKnight; Paul Shinn; Henrike Nelson; Debasish Chattopadhyay; Alan D D'Andrea; Douglas S Auld; Larry J DeLucas; Zhuyin Li; Matthew B Boxer; Anton Simeonov Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 5.157