OBJECTIVE: To assess the additional risk to household contacts from an infectious case of tuberculosis (TB) at home in a rural community in south India. METHODS: In all, 3506 contacts of smear-positive (S+C+) and 2910 contacts of smear-negative TB cases (S-C+) and 246 845 persons with no TB case at home were followed for 15 years, with a repeat survey every 2.5 years consisting of radiographic and sputum examination, selective follow-up of high-risk individuals and passive surveillance. If a case developed during follow-up, all household members were subsequently considered as contacts. Cox's proportional hazards model (multivariate) was employed to compare incidences. RESULTS: The annual incidence of culture-positive TB was respectively 526 and 271 per 100000 population for contacts of smear-positive and smear-negative patients, and 198/100000 in non-contacts. The adjusted hazard rate was 3.4 for contacts of smear-positive patients (95% CI 3.0-3.9) and 1.7 for contacts of smear-negative patients (95% CI 1.4-2.0) as compared to non-contacts. Of 3942 incident cases, 337 (8.5%) came from households with a TB case. CONCLUSION: Although family contacts had a significantly higher incidence, their contribution to total new caseload was meagre. Contact chemoprophylaxis as a public health measure would therefore have limited impact on community TB incidence.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the additional risk to household contacts from an infectious case of tuberculosis (TB) at home in a rural community in south India. METHODS: In all, 3506 contacts of smear-positive (S+C+) and 2910 contacts of smear-negative TB cases (S-C+) and 246 845 persons with no TB case at home were followed for 15 years, with a repeat survey every 2.5 years consisting of radiographic and sputum examination, selective follow-up of high-risk individuals and passive surveillance. If a case developed during follow-up, all household members were subsequently considered as contacts. Cox's proportional hazards model (multivariate) was employed to compare incidences. RESULTS: The annual incidence of culture-positive TB was respectively 526 and 271 per 100000 population for contacts of smear-positive and smear-negative patients, and 198/100000 in non-contacts. The adjusted hazard rate was 3.4 for contacts of smear-positive patients (95% CI 3.0-3.9) and 1.7 for contacts of smear-negative patients (95% CI 1.4-2.0) as compared to non-contacts. Of 3942 incident cases, 337 (8.5%) came from households with a TB case. CONCLUSION: Although family contacts had a significantly higher incidence, their contribution to total new caseload was meagre. Contact chemoprophylaxis as a public health measure would therefore have limited impact on community TB incidence.
Authors: Robert Blakemore; Pamela Nabeta; Amy L Davidow; Viral Vadwai; Rasim Tahirli; Vanisha Munsamy; Mark Nicol; Martin Jones; David H Persing; Doris Hillemann; Sabine Ruesch-Gerdes; Felicity Leisegang; Carlos Zamudio; Camilla Rodrigues; Catharina C Boehme; Mark D Perkins; David Alland Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-11-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Adrienne E Shapiro; Ebrahim Variava; Modiehi H Rakgokong; Neshen Moodley; Binnu Luke; Saeed Salimi; Richard E Chaisson; Jonathan E Golub; Neil A Martinson Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Leonardo Martinez; Ye Shen; Ezekiel Mupere; Allan Kizza; Philip C Hill; Christopher C Whalen Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Edward C Jones-López; Carlos Acuña-Villaorduña; Martin Ssebidandi; Mary Gaeddert; Rachel W Kubiak; Irene Ayakaka; Laura F White; Moses Joloba; Alphonse Okwera; Kevin P Fennelly Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-03-29 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Leonardo Martinez; Nathan C Lo; Olivia Cords; Philip C Hill; Palwasha Khan; Mark Hatherill; Anna Mandalakas; Alexander Kay; Julio Croda; C Robert Horsburgh; Heather J Zar; Jason R Andrews Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2019-05-08 Impact factor: 30.700