Literature DB >> 17351933

Implementation of the ThinPrep imaging system in a high-volume metropolitan laboratory.

Fern S Miller1, Lynn E Nagel, Mary B Kenny-Moynihan.   

Abstract

The Papanicolaou test has proven to be the most effective cancer screening test ever developed. However, with a declining number of skilled cytotechnologists, there is an increased need for computer assistance in cervical cancer screening. The ThinPrep Imaging System (Cytyc Corporation, Marlborough, MA) is a unique system that combines computer imaging technology and human interpretive expertise in the review of ThinPrep Pap test slides. The purpose of this study is to report on the introduction and validation of this technology and present data related to the performance and productivity in our laboratory. Following completion of the ThinPrep Imaging System validation protocol, all imaged ThinPrep Pap test results were tracked and compared with year-2003 manually screened results to identify whether the Imaging System was effective in aiding human interpretive skills. Cases rescreened in the 10% random quality control (QC) program from the negative population that showed abnormal cells consistent with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and above were compared with imaged versus non-imaged cases to establish an estimated laboratory false-negative (F/N) rate. The study compared results of 82,063 manually screened ThinPrep Pap tests in 2003 with 84,473 imaged ThinPrep Pap tests in 2004. Results demonstrated a significant increase in LSIL (37%) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) (42%) detection on the Imager cohort. The F/N rate was reduced by half. The evaluation period after validation of the Imager showed a significant increase in LSIL and HSIL detection with the ThinPrep Imaging System compared to manual screening. These results demonstrate that the Imager has the potential to allow the cytotechnologists to detect more disease and reduce the false-negative rate for the laboratory. Although not evaluated in this study, cytotechnologists reported increased job satisfaction. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17351933     DOI: 10.1002/dc.20627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol        ISSN: 1097-0339            Impact factor:   1.582


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Computer-assisted diagnostics in cervical cytology].

Authors:  H Ikenberg
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  The impact of liquid-based cytology in decreasing the incidence of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Randall K Gibb; Mark G Martens
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011

3.  Comparison of ThinPrep Integrated Imager-Assisted Screening versus Manual Screening of ThinPrep Liquid-Based Cytology Specimens.

Authors:  Kyoko Tanaka; Daisuke Aoki; Akiko Tozawa-Ono; Nao Suzuki; Kiyoshi Takamatsu; Masaru Nakamura; Hajime Tsunoda; Shigeo Seino; Noriko Kobayashi; Takefumi Shirayama; Fumiaki Takahashi
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.319

4.  High-speed spectral nanocytology for early cancer screening.

Authors:  John E Chandler; Hariharan Subramanian; Charles D Maneval; Craig A White; Richard M Levenson; Vadim Backman
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Does the ThinPrep Imaging System increase the detection of high-risk HPV-positive ASC-US and AGUS? The Women and Infants Hospital experience with over 200,000 cervical cytology cases.

Authors:  M Rudhul Quddus; Theresa Neves; Mary E Reilly; Margaret M Steinhoff; C James Sung
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 2.091

6.  Effect of Thin Prep(®) imaging system on laboratory rate and relative sensitivity of atypical squamous cells, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion not excluded and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion interpretations.

Authors:  Brooke R Koltz; Donna K Russell; Naiji Lu; Thomas A Bonfiglio; Sharlin Varghese
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 2.091

7.  The impact of digital imaging in the field of cytopathology.

Authors:  Liron Pantanowitz; Maryanne Hornish; Robert A Goulart
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 2.091

8.  Use of the ThinPrep Imaging System does not alter the frequency of interpreting Papanicolaou tests as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Michael J Thrall; Donna K Russell; Thomas A Bonfiglio; Rana S Hoda
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 2.091

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.