Literature DB >> 17351750

Modeling and detecting potentially ruinous streaks in health expenditures.

Joseph S Koopmeiners1, Bryan E Dowd, Bradley P Carlin.   

Abstract

The mean of a distribution of medical expenditures in an insured population can be affected significantly by the occurrence of a few high cost cases. This fact leads some organizations that hold the primary risk for the population (e.g., health plans or self-insured employers) to seek reinsurance arrangements that spread the risk of high cost cases across a broader pool. Recently, the private reinsurance market has experienced some difficulties, attributable to information asymmetries between primary risk holders and reinsurers. The disproportionate effect of a few high cost cases also has generated interest in the development of "risk-adjustment" systems that attempt to reduce the difference in health plans' unreimbursed costs either to endogenous management decisions or random chance. We discuss these issues in light of a well-known statistical result regarding the probability of "streaks" in random data. We illustrate problems that can arise and suggest methods to distinguish random streaks from systematic trends.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17351750     DOI: 10.1007/s10754-007-9010-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ        ISSN: 1389-6563


  6 in total

1.  Recent trends in self-insured employer health plans.

Authors:  M S Marquis; S H Long
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Some observations about risk adjustment research.

Authors:  B E Dowd; R Feldman
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.730

3.  Managed competition versus industrial purchasing of health care among the Fortune 500.

Authors:  James Maxwell; Peter Temin
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.265

4.  Risk segmentation: goal or problem?

Authors:  R Feldman; B Dowd
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Must adverse selection cause premium spirals?

Authors:  R Feldman; B Dowd
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Bayesian sequential monitoring designs for single-arm clinical trials with multiple outcomes.

Authors:  P F Thall; R M Simon; E H Estey
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.