Literature DB >> 1735165

In vivo relation of intramyocardial blood volume to myocardial perfusion. Evidence supporting microvascular site for autoregulation.

X S Wu1, D L Ewert, Y H Liu, E L Ritman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to explore the role of several factors that affect intramyocardial blood volume by using minimally invasive computed tomography. Anesthetized dogs were scanned with the dynamic spatial reconstructor, a high-speed tomographic scanner, during injection of a bolus of iohexol into the aortic root. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In control dogs, it is indicated that the fraction of myocardium that is blood (FMB, %) relates to myocardial perfusion (F, milliliters per gram per minute) in that region as FMB congruent to a.F1/2, where a = 9.5 +/- 1.2% (milliliters times minute per gram)1/2 (mean +/- SD) in the subendocardium and a = 9.6 +/- 1.1% in the subepicardium. In another group of dogs, for the myocardium perfused by a stenosed epicardial artery, a increased to approximately 10 for a 25-43% stenosis (or pressure gradient of 9 mm Hg across narrowing) and to greater than 11 for a 50-55% stenosis (or pressure gradient of 40 mm Hg across narrowing). In these dogs, flow was not impaired under control hemodynamic conditions, but the usual increase of flow (i.e., flow reserve) observed under maximum vasodilation conditions was impaired. In another group of dogs, progressive embolization (using 15-microns-diameter microspheres) of the left ventricular myocardial microcirculation caused the value of a to remain at approximately 9.5 with embolization up to 50% of the fatal dose of microspheres, but it then decreased progressively with embolization to 4.6 at the fatal dose.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the FMB/F relation reflects hemodynamic conductance at the microvascular level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1735165     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.85.2.730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  16 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative and qualitative analysis and interpretation of CT perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Carolina Valdiviezo; Marietta Ambrose; Vishal Mehra; Albert C Lardo; Joao A C Lima; Richard T George
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Contrast echocardiography 1996. A review.

Authors:  H R Villarraga; D A Foley; S L Mulvagh
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1996

Review 3.  Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced and non-contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of myocardial ischemic reactions: the practice of looking deeply into the myocardium.

Authors:  Cosima Jahnke; Sebastian Kozerke; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Nikolaus Marx; Ingo Paetsch
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Glossary: methods for the measurement of coronary blood flow and myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  S G Sakka; D R Wallbridge; G Heusch
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 17.165

5.  Quantitative cardiac perfusion: a noninvasive spin-labeling method that exploits coronary vessel geometry.

Authors:  S B Reeder; M K Atalay; E R McVeigh; E A Zerhouni; J R Forder
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Insights into the assessment of myocardial perfusion offered by different cardiac imaging modalities.

Authors:  J R Lindner; S Kaul
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  The role of acquisition and quantification methods in myocardial blood flow estimability for myocardial perfusion imaging CT.

Authors:  Brendan L Eck; Raymond F Muzic; Jacob Levi; Hao Wu; Rachid Fahmi; Yuemeng Li; Anas Fares; Mani Vembar; Amar Dhanantwari; Hiram G Bezerra; David L Wilson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Leakage and water exchange characterization of gadofosveset in the myocardium.

Authors:  Octavia Bane; Daniel C Lee; Brandon C Benefield; Kathleen R Harris; Neil R Chatterjee; James C Carr; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Myocardial perfusion imaging using a non-contrast agent MR imaging technique.

Authors:  C Waller; K H Hiller; S Voll; A Haase; G Ertl; W R Bauer
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Non-invasive measures of coronary microcirculation: Taking the long road to the clinic.

Authors:  Kieran S Chung; Patricia K Nguyen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.