Andrea L Gropman1, Sarah Elsea, Wallace C Duncan, Ann C M Smith. 1. Department of Neurology, Children's National Medical Center, George Washington University of the Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20010, USA. agropman@cnmc.org
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent clinical, neuroimaging, sleep, and molecular cytogenetic studies have provided new insights into the mechanisms leading to the Smith-Magenis phenotype and are summarized in this review. RECENT FINDINGS: Cross sectional studies of patients with Smith-Magenis syndrome have found evidence for central and peripheral nervous system abnormalities, neurobehavioral disturbances, and an inverted pattern of melatonin secretion leading to circadian rhythm disturbance. A common chromosome 17p11.2 deletion interval spanning approximately 3.5 Mb is identified in about 70% of individuals with chromosome deletion. Recently heterozygous point mutations in the RAI1 gene within the Smith-Magenis syndrome critical region have been reported in Smith-Magenis syndrome patients without detectable deletion by fluorescent in-situ hybridization. Patients with intragenic mutations in RAI1 as well as those with deletions share most but not all aspects of the phenotype. SUMMARY: Findings from molecular cytogenetic analysis suggest that other genes or genetic background may play a role in altering the functional availability of RAI1 for downstream effects. Further research into additional genes in the Smith-Magenis syndrome critical region will help define the role they play in modifying features or severity of the Smith-Magenis syndrome phenotype. More research is needed to translate advances in clinical research into new treatment options to address the sleep and neurobehavioral problems in this disorder.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent clinical, neuroimaging, sleep, and molecular cytogenetic studies have provided new insights into the mechanisms leading to the Smith-Magenis phenotype and are summarized in this review. RECENT FINDINGS: Cross sectional studies of patients with Smith-Magenis syndrome have found evidence for central and peripheral nervous system abnormalities, neurobehavioral disturbances, and an inverted pattern of melatonin secretion leading to circadian rhythm disturbance. A common chromosome 17p11.2 deletion interval spanning approximately 3.5 Mb is identified in about 70% of individuals with chromosome deletion. Recently heterozygous point mutations in the RAI1 gene within the Smith-Magenis syndrome critical region have been reported in Smith-Magenis syndromepatients without detectable deletion by fluorescent in-situ hybridization. Patients with intragenic mutations in RAI1 as well as those with deletions share most but not all aspects of the phenotype. SUMMARY: Findings from molecular cytogenetic analysis suggest that other genes or genetic background may play a role in altering the functional availability of RAI1 for downstream effects. Further research into additional genes in the Smith-Magenis syndrome critical region will help define the role they play in modifying features or severity of the Smith-Magenis syndrome phenotype. More research is needed to translate advances in clinical research into new treatment options to address the sleep and neurobehavioral problems in this disorder.
Authors: C Dubourg; F Bonnet-Brilhault; A Toutain; C Mignot; A Jacquette; A Dieux; M Gérard; M-P Beaumont-Epinette; S Julia; B Isidor; M Rossi; S Odent; C Bendavid; C Barthélémy; A Verloes; V David Journal: Mol Syndromol Date: 2014-01-07
Authors: Megan A Brendal; Kelly A King; Christopher K Zalewski; Brenda M Finucane; Wendy Introne; Carmen C Brewer; Ann C M Smith Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2017-04-14 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Nicholas J Neill; Beth S Torchia; Bassem A Bejjani; Lisa G Shaffer; Blake C Ballif Journal: Mol Cytogenet Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 2.009
Authors: Eilis A Boudreau; Kyle P Johnson; Angela R Jackman; Jan Blancato; Marjan Huizing; Claude Bendavid; Marypat Jones; Settara C Chandrasekharappa; Alfred J Lewy; Ann C M Smith; R Ellen Magenis Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Pamela L Wolters; Andrea L Gropman; Staci C Martin; Michaele R Smith; Hanna L Hildenbrand; Carmen C Brewer; Ann C M Smith Journal: Pediatr Neurol Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 3.372
Authors: Stephen R Williams; Deborah Zies; Sureni V Mullegama; Michael S Grotewiel; Sarah H Elsea Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2012-05-10 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Irene Hidalgo-De la Guía; Elena Garayzábal-Heinze; Pedro Gómez-Vilda; Rafael Martínez-Olalla; Daniel Palacios-Alonso Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2021-06-03 Impact factor: 3.169