Literature DB >> 1735144

Complications and validity of pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism.

P D Stein1, C Athanasoulis, A Alavi, R H Greenspan, C A Hales, H A Saltzman, C E Vreim, M L Terrin, J G Weg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) addressed the value of ventilation/perfusion scans in acute pulmonary embolism (PE). The present study evaluates the risks and diagnostic validity of pulmonary angiography in 1,111 patients who underwent angiography in PIOPED: METHODS AND
RESULTS: Complications were death in five (0.5%), major nonfatal complications in nine (1%), and less significant or minor in 60 (5%). More fatal or major nonfatal complications occurred in patients from the medical intensive care unit than elsewhere: five of 122 (4%) versus nine of 989 (1%) (p less than 0.02). Pulmonary artery pressure, volume of contrast material, and presence of PE did not significantly affect the frequency of complications. Renal dysfunction, either major (requiring dialysis) or less severe, occurred in 13 of 1,111 (1%). Patients who developed renal dysfunction after angiography were older than those who did not have renal dysfunction: 74 +/- 13 years versus 57 +/- 17 years (p less than 0.001). Angiograms were nondiagnostic in 35 of 1,111 (3%), and studies were incomplete in 12 of 1,111 (1%), usually because of a complication. Surveillance after negative angiograms showed PE in four of 675 (0.6%). Angiograms, interpreted on the basis of consensus readings, resulted in an unchallenged diagnosis in 96%.
CONCLUSIONS: The risks of pulmonary angiography were sufficiently low to justify it as a diagnostic tool in the appropriate clinical setting. Clinical judgment is probably the most important consideration in the assessment of risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1735144     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.85.2.462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  44 in total

Review 1.  Spiral computed tomographic scanning and magnetic resonance angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  P A Grenier; C Beigelman
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Comparison of doses for pulmonary embolism detection with helical CT and pulmonary angiography.

Authors:  Arnaud Resten; Franck Mausoleo; M Valero; Dominique Musset
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-07-04       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Pulmonary embolism: is multislice CT the method of choice? For.

Authors:  Ieneke J C Hartmann; Mathias Prokop
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Clinical utility of D-dimer in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and nondiagnostic lung scans or negative CT findings.

Authors:  Suman W Rathbun; Thomas L Whitsett; Sara K Vesely; Gary E Raskob
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  CTPA as the gold standard for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Rosa M Estrada-Y-Martin; Sandra A Oldham
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 6.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Pierre-Marie Roy; Isabelle Colombet; Pierre Durieux; Gilles Chatellier; Hervé Sors; Guy Meyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-07-30

7.  Low yield of ventilation and perfusion imaging for the evaluation of pulmonary embolism after indeterminate CT pulmonary angiography.

Authors:  Brian R Curtis; Mougnyan Cox; Michael Poplawski; Andrej Lyshchik
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2017-04-12

Review 8.  Multidetector computed tomographic angiography of the cardiovascular system.

Authors:  Joshua Burrill; Zaid Dabbagh; Frank Gollub; Mohamed Hamady
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 9.  Advances in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Philip S Wells
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 10.  Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Clive Kearon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.