PURPOSE: To determine how CancerGuidesâ, an integrative cancer care training program, would affect participants' perception of their professional skills, their mood, use of self care and mind-body modalities, and the acceptance of integrative cancer care at their institutions. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative and quantitative measures were used during the training program and at 6-month follow-up. A focus group met before and after the training, and individual interviews of focus group participants were done at follow-up. METHODS: The week-long program consisted of lectures that provided information on integrating conventional and complementary therapies into individualized programs of cancer care. Small group sessions used mind-body techniques to allow participants to understand the dilemmas faced by cancer patients. A self-report survey was administered at the training program and at 6-month follow-up. The survey included questions on the personal and professional use of modalities and on participants' sense of how well they met the course objectives. Qualitative questions addressed self-care, changes in clinical practice, and the acceptance of integrative therapies by their institutions. The Profile of Mood States was administered before and after the training. RESULTS: Six months after the training, there was a significant increase in the use and/or recommendation of complementary and alternative medicine modalities in clinical practice and a significant increase in the personal practice of these modalities. Participants' perceived level of skill for all of the course objectives was significantly increased following the training and was maintained at 6-month follow-up. There were significant reductions in the Anger-Hostility and Tension-Anxiety subscale scores of the Profile of Mood States questionnaire. In response to qualitative questions, participants reported positive changes in patient care and in their clinical practices at 6-month follow-up. The subset of participants in the focus group interviews reported similar improvements. Thirty-five percent of those responding at follow-up reported an increase in acceptance of integrative cancer therapies at their institutions, and 77% reported making positive changes in self-care. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer-Guides provided training that allowed participants to enhance personal self-care, to interact more effectively with their patients, and to develop programs of integrative cancer care.
PURPOSE: To determine how CancerGuidesâ, an integrative cancer care training program, would affect participants' perception of their professional skills, their mood, use of self care and mind-body modalities, and the acceptance of integrative cancer care at their institutions. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative and quantitative measures were used during the training program and at 6-month follow-up. A focus group met before and after the training, and individual interviews of focus group participants were done at follow-up. METHODS: The week-long program consisted of lectures that provided information on integrating conventional and complementary therapies into individualized programs of cancer care. Small group sessions used mind-body techniques to allow participants to understand the dilemmas faced by cancerpatients. A self-report survey was administered at the training program and at 6-month follow-up. The survey included questions on the personal and professional use of modalities and on participants' sense of how well they met the course objectives. Qualitative questions addressed self-care, changes in clinical practice, and the acceptance of integrative therapies by their institutions. The Profile of Mood States was administered before and after the training. RESULTS: Six months after the training, there was a significant increase in the use and/or recommendation of complementary and alternative medicine modalities in clinical practice and a significant increase in the personal practice of these modalities. Participants' perceived level of skill for all of the course objectives was significantly increased following the training and was maintained at 6-month follow-up. There were significant reductions in the Anger-Hostility and Tension-Anxiety subscale scores of the Profile of Mood States questionnaire. In response to qualitative questions, participants reported positive changes in patient care and in their clinical practices at 6-month follow-up. The subset of participants in the focus group interviews reported similar improvements. Thirty-five percent of those responding at follow-up reported an increase in acceptance of integrative cancer therapies at their institutions, and 77% reported making positive changes in self-care. CONCLUSIONS:Cancer-Guides provided training that allowed participants to enhance personal self-care, to interact more effectively with their patients, and to develop programs of integrative cancer care.
Authors: Lynda G Balneaves; Tracy L O Truant; Mary Kelly; Marja J Verhoef; B Joyce Davison Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2007-07-03 Impact factor: 3.603