Literature DB >> 17350023

Correlation of carotid atheromatous plaque inflammation with biomechanical stress: utility of USPIO enhanced MR imaging and finite element analysis.

T Y Tang1, S P S Howarth, Z Y Li, S R Miller, M J Graves, J M U-King-Im, R A Trivedi, S R Walsh, A P Brown, P J Kirkpatrick, M E Gaunt, J H Gillard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore whether there is a relationship between the degree of MR-defined inflammation using ultra small super-paramagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) particles, and biomechanical stress using finite element analysis (FEA) techniques, in carotid atheromatous plaques. METHODS AND
RESULTS: 18 patients with angiographically proven carotid stenoses underwent multi-sequence MR imaging before and 36 h after USPIO infusion. T(2)(*) weighted images were manually segmented into quadrants and the signal change in each quadrant normalised to adjacent muscle was calculated after USPIO administration. Plaque geometry was obtained from the rest of the multi-sequence dataset and used within a FEA model to predict maximal stress concentration within each slice. Subsequently, a new statistical model was developed to explicitly investigate the form of the relationship between biomechanical stress and signal change. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for USPIO enhanced signal change and maximal biomechanical stress was -0.60 (p=0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: There is an association between biomechanical stress and USPIO enhanced MR-defined inflammation within carotid atheroma, both known risk factors for plaque vulnerability. This underlines the complex interaction between physiological processes and biomechanical mechanisms in the development of carotid atheroma. However, this is preliminary data that will need validation in a larger cohort of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17350023     DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atherosclerosis        ISSN: 0021-9150            Impact factor:   5.162


  18 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive imaging of atheromatous carotid plaques.

Authors:  Umar Sadat; Zhi-Yong Li; Martin J Graves; Tjun Y Tang; Jonathan H Gillard
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2009-03

Review 2.  Imaging outcomes in cardiovascular clinical trials.

Authors:  Louai Razzouk; Michael E Farkouh
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  MRI of carotid atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Chun Yuan; Minako Oikawa; Zach Miller; Thomas Hatsukami
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Imaging subclinical atherosclerosis: is it ready for prime time? A review.

Authors:  Leticia Fernández-Friera; Borja Ibáñez; Valentín Fuster
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 5.  The role of noninvasive imaging in promoting cardiovascular health.

Authors:  Valentin Fuster; Torsten P Vahl
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Carotid atheroma rupture observed in vivo and FSI-predicted stress distribution based on pre-rupture imaging.

Authors:  Joseph R Leach; Vitaliy L Rayz; Bruno Soares; Max Wintermark; Mohammad R K Mofrad; David Saloner
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 7.  Recent developments and new perspectives on imaging of atherosclerotic plaque: role of anatomical, cellular and molecular MRI part III.

Authors:  Bernard C M te Boekhorst; Maarten-Jan M Cramer; Gerard Pasterkamp; Cees J A van Echteld; Pieter A F M Doevendans
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Multimodal iron oxide nanoparticles for hybrid biomedical imaging.

Authors:  Timo Heidt; Matthias Nahrendorf
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Molecular imaging of atherosclerosis: clinical state-of-the-art.

Authors:  Farouc A Jaffer; Johan W Verjans
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 10.  Cellular magnetic resonance imaging: potential for use in assessing aspects of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Z Zhang; N Mascheri; R Dharmakumar; D Li
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.414

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.