Literature DB >> 17349983

Brain and cognitive processes of imitation in bimanual situations: Making inferences about mirror neuron systems.

Elizabeth A Franz1, Shelley Ford, Simon Werner.   

Abstract

The relationship between mirror neuron systems and imitation is being widely studied. However, most if not all, studies on imitation have investigated only the mirror mode. The present study examined whether imitation in a mirror (specular) mode is likely to reflect similar or distinct neural processes and psychological principles as imitation in a non-mirror (anatomical) mode. Experiment 1 examined whether altering sensory information may reverse the typical mirror mode advantage, resulting in superior performance in the non-mirror mode. Experiment 2 examined whether the two different modes of imitation rely differentially on target selection (goals) and effector selection (means). Experiment 3 examined whether spatial translations are likely to occur in a typical non-mirror imitation mode. Experiment 4 examined whether non-mirror imitation would be the naturally selected mode of imitation under some situations. Findings from all experiments demonstrated marked differences between mirror and non-mirror modes of imitation. The implications of these findings may raise challenges for theories and models of mirror neurons.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17349983     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  10 in total

1.  Prevalence, characteristics and a neurocognitive model of mirror-touch synaesthesia.

Authors:  Michael J Banissy; Roi Cohen Kadosh; Gerrit W Maus; Vincent Walsh; Jamie Ward
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Movements, actions and tool-use actions: an ideomotor approach to imitation.

Authors:  Cristina Massen; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Movement interference in autism-spectrum disorder.

Authors:  E Gowen; J Stanley; R C Miall
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Imitation of hand and tool actions is effector-independent.

Authors:  M van Elk; H T van Schie; H Bekkering
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Observation and imitation of actions performed by humans, androids, and robots: an EMG study.

Authors:  Galit Hofree; Burcu A Urgen; Piotr Winkielman; Ayse P Saygin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  The effect of different imitation models on theaccuracy and speed of imitation of movement.

Authors:  Hitomi Nishizawa; Teiji Kimura; Ah-Cheng Goh
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-11-30

7.  An fNIRS Study of Brain Lateralization During Observation and Execution of a Fine Motor Task.

Authors:  Kosar Khaksari; Elizabeth G Smith; Helga O Miguel; Selin Zeytinoglu; Nathan Fox; Amir H Gandjbakhche
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.473

8.  Is the Imitative Competence an Asymmetrically Distributed Function?

Authors:  Mara Fabri; Chiara Pierpaoli; Nicoletta Foschi; Gabriele Polonara
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-24

9.  Learning an Embodied Visual Language: Four Imitation Strategies Available to Sign Learners.

Authors:  Aaron Shield; Richard P Meier
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-30

10.  Seeing What I Did (Not): Cerebral and Behavioral Effects of Agency and Perspective on Episodic Memory Re-activation.

Authors:  Benjamin Jainta; Sophie Siestrup; Nadiya El-Sourani; Ima Trempler; Moritz F Wurm; Markus Werning; Sen Cheng; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.558

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.