Literature DB >> 17349899

Discordance between serum creatinine and creatinine clearance for identification of ED patients with abdominal pain at risk for contrast-induced nephropathy.

Roger A Band1, David F Gaieski, Angela M Mills, Keara L Sease, Frances S Shofer, Jennifer L Robey, Judd E Hollander.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Despite creatinine clearance (CrCl) being a better estimate of renal function, serum creatinine (Cr) is more commonly used to screen for renal insufficiency in patients scheduled for an enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) in an attempt to reduce the likelihood of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). Our objective was to determine the incidence of renal insufficiency (a CrCl <60 mL/min) among patients who have serum Cr below 1.5 mg/dL (the most commonly accepted Cr cutoff for the administration of intravenous contrast). This study was conducted in a population of emergency department patients with acute abdominal pain being considered for CT scan.
METHODS: We performed post hoc analysis of a prospective cross-sectional study that enrolled nongravid adults with acute nontraumatic abdominal pain. Patients on dialysis were excluded. The data that we collected included demographics, history, duration/description of pain, patient reported weight, laboratory data, imaging studies, and final diagnosis. Creatinine clearance values (< or >60 mL/min) were compared to Cr values of 1.0, 1.2, 1.5, and 1.8 mg/dL to determine the percentage of patients at risk for nephropathy after contrast injection at each Cr cutoff. Descriptive statistics were used with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: Seven hundred sixty-five patients were enrolled; 59% (451/765) had an abdominal CT scan. Of 108 patients with CrCl less than 60 mL/min, 59 patients had a Cr less than 1.8 mg/dL (55%; 95% CI, 45%-64%); 43 had a Cr less than 1.5 mg/dL, the most commonly accepted Cr cutoff for contrast administration (40%; 95% CI, 31%-50%); 21 patients had a Cr less than 1.2 mg/dL (19%; 95% CI, 12%-28%); and 10 had a Cr less than 1.0 mg/dL (9%; 95% CI, 5%-16%).
CONCLUSION: The most commonly used Cr cutoff (1.5 mg/dL) for contrast administration fails to identify 40% of the patients at risk for CIN. Future studies should address whether using CrCl rather than serum Cr decreases the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17349899     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  3 in total

Review 1.  Contrast-induced acute kidney injury: specialty-specific protocols for interventional radiology, diagnostic computed tomography radiology, and interventional cardiology.

Authors:  Stanley Goldfarb; Peter A McCullough; John McDermott; Spencer B Gay
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Follow up for emergency department patients after intravenous contrast and risk of nephropathy.

Authors:  Getaw Worku Hassen; Albert Hwang; Lydia Liyun Liu; Felicia Mualim; Toshiro Sembo; Ting Jia Tu; Daniel Hsiang Wei; Paul Johnston; Ana Costea; Carlos Meletiche; Shakeel Usmani; Andre Barber; Rajnish Jaiswal; Hossein Kalantari
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-01-07

3.  Contrast CT Scans in the Emergency Department Do Not Increase Risk of Adverse Renal Outcomes.

Authors:  Michael Heller; Paul Krieger; Douglas Finefrock; Thomas Nguyen; Saadia Akhtar
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-06-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.