Literature DB >> 17349805

Context-specific learning and control: the roles of awareness, task relevance, and relative salience.

Matthew J C Crump1, Joaquín M M Vaquero, Bruce Milliken.   

Abstract

The processes mediating dynamic and flexible responding to rapidly changing task-environments are not well understood. In the present research we employ a Stroop procedure to clarify the contribution of context-sensitive control processes to online performance. In prior work Stroop interference varied as a function of probe location context, with larger Stroop interference occurring for contexts associated with a high proportion of congruent items [Crump, M. J., Gong, Z., & Milliken, B. (2006). The context-specific proportion congruent stroop effect: location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin &Review, 13, 316-321.] Here, we demonstrate that this effect does not depend on awareness of the context manipulation, but that it can depend on attention to the predictive context dimension, and on the relative salience of the target and predictive context dimensions. We discuss the implications of our results for current theories of cognitive control.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17349805     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  32 in total

1.  Contextual factors multiplex to control multisensory processes.

Authors:  Beatriz R Sarmiento; Pawel J Matusz; Daniel Sanabria; Micah M Murray
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Activation of context-specific attentional control sets by exogenous allocation of visual attention to the context?

Authors:  Caroline Gottschalk; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-05

3.  Conflict adaptation in time: foreperiods as contextual cues for attentional adjustment.

Authors:  Mike Wendt; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

4.  Strategic behavior without awareness? Effects of implicit learning in the Eriksen flanker paradigm.

Authors:  Rodica Ghinescu; Todd R Schachtman; Michael A Stadler; Monica Fabiani; Gabriele Gratton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-03

Review 5.  Evidence against conflict monitoring and adaptation: An updated review.

Authors:  James R Schmidt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

6.  Using neural pattern classifiers to quantify the modularity of conflict-control mechanisms in the human brain.

Authors:  Jiefeng Jiang; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Cognitive effort is modulated outside of the explicit awareness of conflict frequency: Evidence from pupillometry.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Diede; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Post-conflict slowing after incongruent stimuli: from general to conflict-specific.

Authors:  Alodie Rey-Mermet; Beat Meier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-03-28

9.  Repetition or alternation of context influences sequential congruency effect depending on the presence of contingency.

Authors:  Nart Bedin Atalay; Asli Bahar Inan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-23

10.  Conflict and disfluency as aversive signals: context-specific processing adjustments are modulated by affective location associations.

Authors:  Gesine Dreisbach; Anna-Lena Reindl; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-11-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.