AIM: To compare the antiproliferative and cytotoxic properties of bevacizumab (Avastin), pegaptanib (Macugen) and ranibizumab (Lucentis) on human retinal pigment epithelium (ARPE19) cells, rat retinal ganglion cells (RGC5) and pig choroidal endothelial cells (CEC). METHODS: Monolayer cultures of ARPE19, RGC5 and CEC were used. Bevacizumab (0.1-0.3 mg/ml), pegaptanib (0.025-0.08 mg/ml) or ranibizumab (0.04-0.125 mg/ml) diluted in culture medium were added to the cells. Expression of VEGF-receptors (VEGFR1 and VEGFR2) and von Willebrand factor (a marker for endothelial cells) were analysed by immunohistochemistry. CEC cells were stimulated with VEGF. Cellular proliferative activity was monitored by BrdU-incorporation into cellular DNA. For cytotoxicity assays cells were grown to confluence and then cultured in a serum-depleted medium to ensure a static milieu. MTT-test was performed after one day. RESULTS: CEC and ARPE19 cells stained positively for VEGFR1 and VEGFR2. More than 95% of the CEC cells were positive for von Willebrand factor. Ranibizumab reduced CEC cell proliferation by 44.1%, bevacizumab by 38.2% and pegaptanib by 35.1% when the drugs were used at their established clinical doses. The differences, however, between the three drugs in respect to cell growth inhibition were not statistically significant. Only a mild antiproliferative effect of bevacizumab or pegaptanib on ARPE19 cells could be observed. Ranibizumab did not alter ARPE19 cell proliferation. No cytotoxicity on RGC5, CEC and ARPE19 cells could be seen. CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab, pegaptanib and ranibizumab significantly suppress choroidal endothelial cell proliferation. However, when used at the currently established doses none of the drugs was superior over the others in respect to endothelial cell growth inhibition. The biocompatibility of all three drugs--including the off-label bevacizumab--seems to be excellent when used at the currently recommended intravitreal dose.
AIM: To compare the antiproliferative and cytotoxic properties of bevacizumab (Avastin), pegaptanib (Macugen) and ranibizumab (Lucentis) on human retinal pigment epithelium (ARPE19) cells, rat retinal ganglion cells (RGC5) and pig choroidal endothelial cells (CEC). METHODS: Monolayer cultures of ARPE19, RGC5 and CEC were used. Bevacizumab (0.1-0.3 mg/ml), pegaptanib (0.025-0.08 mg/ml) or ranibizumab (0.04-0.125 mg/ml) diluted in culture medium were added to the cells. Expression of VEGF-receptors (VEGFR1 and VEGFR2) and von Willebrand factor (a marker for endothelial cells) were analysed by immunohistochemistry. CEC cells were stimulated with VEGF. Cellular proliferative activity was monitored by BrdU-incorporation into cellular DNA. For cytotoxicity assays cells were grown to confluence and then cultured in a serum-depleted medium to ensure a static milieu. MTT-test was performed after one day. RESULTS: CEC and ARPE19 cells stained positively for VEGFR1 and VEGFR2. More than 95% of the CEC cells were positive for von Willebrand factor. Ranibizumab reduced CEC cell proliferation by 44.1%, bevacizumab by 38.2% and pegaptanib by 35.1% when the drugs were used at their established clinical doses. The differences, however, between the three drugs in respect to cell growth inhibition were not statistically significant. Only a mild antiproliferative effect of bevacizumab or pegaptanib on ARPE19 cells could be observed. Ranibizumab did not alter ARPE19 cell proliferation. No cytotoxicity on RGC5, CEC and ARPE19 cells could be seen. CONCLUSIONS:Bevacizumab, pegaptanib and ranibizumab significantly suppress choroidal endothelial cell proliferation. However, when used at the currently established doses none of the drugs was superior over the others in respect to endothelial cell growth inhibition. The biocompatibility of all three drugs--including the off-label bevacizumab--seems to be excellent when used at the currently recommended intravitreal dose.
Authors: M Lüke; M Warga; F Ziemssen; F Gelisken; S Grisanti; T Schneider; C Lüke; M Partsch; K U Bartz-Schmidt; P Szurman Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2006-06-05 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: H Gille; J Kowalski; B Li; J LeCouter; B Moffat; T F Zioncheck; N Pelletier; N Ferrara Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2000-10-31 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Herbert Hurwitz; Louis Fehrenbacher; William Novotny; Thomas Cartwright; John Hainsworth; William Heim; Jordan Berlin; Ari Baron; Susan Griffing; Eric Holmgren; Napoleone Ferrara; Gwen Fyfe; Beth Rogers; Robert Ross; Fairooz Kabbinavar Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-06-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Eugene W M Ng; David T Shima; Perry Calias; Emmett T Cunningham; David R Guyer; Anthony P Adamis Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 84.694
Authors: C Wertheimer; R Liegl; M Kernt; W Mayer; D Docheva; A Kampik; K H Eibl-Lindner Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Ciro Costagliola; Ugo Cipollone; Michele Rinaldi; Michele della Corte; Francesco Semeraro; Mario R Romano Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Javier Cáceres-Del-Carpio; M Tarek Moustafa; Jaime Toledo-Corral; Mohamed A Hamid; Shari R Atilano; Kevin Schneider; Paula S Fukuhara; Rodrigo Donato Costa; J Lucas Norman; Deepika Malik; Marilyn Chwa; David S Boyer; G Astrid Limb; M Cristina Kenney; Baruch D Kuppermann Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2020-01-03 Impact factor: 3.467