Literature DB >> 17346548

Enhancing sealing of fetal membrane defects using tissue engineered native amniotic scaffolds in the rabbit model.

Nicole Ochsenbein-Kölble1, Jacques Jani, Liesbeth Lewi, Godelieve Verbist, Lisbeth Vercruysse, Bettina Portmann-Lanz, Klaus Marquardt, Roland Zimmermann, Jan Deprest.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of native engineered amniotic scaffolds (AS) and polyesterurethane scaffolds (DegraPol) and document wound healing response when sealing iatrogenic fetal membrane defects in the rabbit model. STUDY
DESIGN: Native AS were engineered from freshly harvested membranes of 23 days' gestational age (GA; term = 31-2 d). Acellularity of AS was assessed by histology, light and scanning electron microscopy. Fetal membrane defects were created by 14 gauge-needle puncture at GA 23 days and primarily closed with AS (n = 10) or DegraPol (n = 10) or left unclosed (positive controls; n = 10). Sixty-one sacs served as negative controls. At GA 30 days a second look hysterotomy was performed to assess presence of amniotic fluid (AF) and harvest plugging sites for microscopic evaluation.
RESULTS: Engineered AS had a cell-free collagenous fiber network. AF was significantly higher only in the DegraPol group (78%; P < .05) compared to the AF in positive controls (17%). Integration of plugs in the fetal membrane defect was better with AS than DegraPol, with higher reepithelialization rates (AS: 52.5% +/- 6.5%; DegraPol: 11.6% +/- 2.6%; P < .001) and proliferation indices (AS: 0.47 +/- 0.03; DegraPol: 0.28 +/- 0.04; P = .001). In both treatment groups, cell proliferation in the myometrium was increased (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: Native AS seal iatrogenic fetal membrane defects better than DegraPol. Within a week, there is abundant reepithelilization and minimal local inflammation. This yields the proof of principle that engineered native, amniotic membrane scaffolds enhance fetal membrane wound healing response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17346548     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

1.  Tissue engineering a fetal membrane.

Authors:  Shengli Mi; Anna L David; Bipasha Chowdhury; Roanne Razalia Jones; Ian William Hamley; Adam M Squires; Che John Connon
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  On the defect tolerance of fetal membranes.

Authors:  Kevin Bircher; Alexander E Ehret; Deborah Spiess; Martin Ehrbar; Ana Paula Simões-Wüst; Nicole Ochsenbein-Kölble; Roland Zimmermann; Edoardo Mazza
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 3.  Biomaterials in fetal surgery.

Authors:  Sally M Winkler; Michael R Harrison; Phillip B Messersmith
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 6.843

4.  Injectable candidate sealants for fetal membrane repair: bonding and toxicity in vitro.

Authors:  Grozdana Bilic; Carrie Brubaker; Phillip B Messersmith; Ajit S Mallik; Thomas M Quinn; Claudia Haller; Elisa Done; Leonardo Gucciardo; Steffen M Zeisberger; Roland Zimmermann; Jan Deprest; Andreas H Zisch
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Cryopreserved human amniotic membrane and a bioinspired underwater adhesive to seal and promote healing of iatrogenic fetal membrane defect sites.

Authors:  R Papanna; L K Mann; S C G Tseng; R J Stewart; S S Kaur; M M Swindle; T R Kyriakides; N Tatevian; K J Moise
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Trauma induces overexpression of Cx43 in human fetal membrane defects.

Authors:  David W Barrett; Aumie Kethees; Christopher Thrasivoulou; Alvaro Mata; Alex Virasami; Neil J Sebire; Alex C Engels; Jan A Deprest; David L Becker; Anna L David; Tina T Chowdhury
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 7.  A comprehensive review on methods for promotion of mechanical features and biodegradation rate in amniotic membrane scaffolds.

Authors:  Raana Sarvari; Peyman Keyhanvar; Samira Agbolaghi; Leila Roshangar; Erfan Bahremani; Neda Keyhanvar; Mehdi Haghdoost; Saeed Heidari Keshel; Afsaneh Taghikhani; Nima Firouzi; Amir Valizadeh; Elham Hamedi; Mohammad Nouri
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.896

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.