PURPOSE: To differentiate fibroblastic meningiomas, usually considered to be of a hard consistency, from other benign subtypes using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From DTI data sets of 30 patients with benign meningiomas, we calculated diffusion tensors and mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA) maps as well as barycentric maps representing the geometrical shape of the tensors. The findings were compared to postoperative histology. The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and informed consent was given by the patients. RESULTS: According to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), FA was the best parameter to differentiate between the subtypes (F=32.2; p<0.0001). Regarding tensor shape, endothelial meningiomas were represented by spherical tensors (80%) corresponding to isotropic diffusion, whereas the fibroblastic meningiomas showed a high percentage (43%) of nonspherical tensors, indicating planar or longitudinal diffusion. The difference was highly significant (F=28.4; p<0.0001) and may be due to the fascicular arrangement of long spindle-shaped tumor cells and the high content of intra- and interfascicular fibers as shown in the histology. In addition, a capsule-like rim of the in-plane diffusion surrounded most meningiomas irrespective of their histological type. CONCLUSION: If these results correlate to the intraoperative findings of meningioma consistency, DTI-based measurement of FA and analysis of the shape of the diffusion tensor is a promising method to differentiate between fibroblastic and other subtypes of benign meningiomas in order to get information about their "hard" or "soft" consistency prior to removal. Copyright (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To differentiate fibroblastic meningiomas, usually considered to be of a hard consistency, from other benign subtypes using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From DTI data sets of 30 patients with benign meningiomas, we calculated diffusion tensors and mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA) maps as well as barycentric maps representing the geometrical shape of the tensors. The findings were compared to postoperative histology. The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and informed consent was given by the patients. RESULTS: According to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), FA was the best parameter to differentiate between the subtypes (F=32.2; p<0.0001). Regarding tensor shape, endothelial meningiomas were represented by spherical tensors (80%) corresponding to isotropic diffusion, whereas the fibroblastic meningiomas showed a high percentage (43%) of nonspherical tensors, indicating planar or longitudinal diffusion. The difference was highly significant (F=28.4; p<0.0001) and may be due to the fascicular arrangement of long spindle-shaped tumor cells and the high content of intra- and interfascicular fibers as shown in the histology. In addition, a capsule-like rim of the in-plane diffusion surrounded most meningiomas irrespective of their histological type. CONCLUSION: If these results correlate to the intraoperative findings of meningioma consistency, DTI-based measurement of FA and analysis of the shape of the diffusion tensor is a promising method to differentiate between fibroblastic and other subtypes of benign meningiomas in order to get information about their "hard" or "soft" consistency prior to removal. Copyright (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: E E Sigmund; G Y Cho; S Kim; M Finn; M Moccaldi; J H Jensen; D K Sodickson; J D Goldberg; S Formenti; L Moy Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: S Wang; S J Kim; H Poptani; J H Woo; S Mohan; R Jin; M R Voluck; D M O'Rourke; R L Wolf; E R Melhem; S Kim Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Mark S Shiroishi; Steven Y Cen; Benita Tamrazi; Francesco D'Amore; Alexander Lerner; Kevin S King; Paul E Kim; Meng Law; Darryl H Hwang; Orest B Boyko; Chia-Shang J Liu Journal: Neurosurg Clin N Am Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 2.509
Authors: Sumei Wang; Sungheon Kim; Sanjeev Chawla; Ronald L Wolf; Wei-Guo Zhang; Donald M O'Rourke; Kevin D Judy; Elias R Melhem; Harish Poptani Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-10-07 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Filip Szczepankiewicz; Danielle van Westen; Elisabet Englund; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Freddy Ståhlberg; Jimmy Lätt; Pia C Sundgren; Markus Nilsson Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 6.556