Literature DB >> 17345143

Endoscopic ultrasound for the evaluation of Nissen fundoplication integrity: a blinded comparison with conventional testing.

E Y Chang1, R C Minjarez, C Y Kim, A K Seltman, D V Gopal, B Diggs, R Davila, J G Hunter, B A Jobe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For patients whose symptoms develop after Nissen fundoplication, the precise mechanism of anatomic failure can be difficult to determine. The authors have previously reported the endosonographic hallmarks defining an intact Nissen fundoplication in swine and the known causes of failure. The current clinical trial tested the hypothesis that a defined set of endosonographic criteria can be applied to determine fundoplication integrity in humans.
METHODS: The study enrolled seven symptomatic and nine asymptomatic subjects at a mean of 6 years (range, 1-30 years) after Nissen fundoplication. A validated gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-specific questionnaire and medication history were completed. Before endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), all the patients underwent complete conventional testing (upper endoscopy, esophagram, manometry, 24-h pH). A diagnosis was rendered on the basis of combined test results. Then EUS was performed by an observer blinded to symptoms, medication use, and conventional testing diagnoses. Because EUS and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) are uniformly performed in combination, the EUS diagnosis was rendered on the basis of previously established criteria combined with the EGD interpretation. The diagnoses then were compared to examine the contribution of EUS in this setting.
RESULTS: The technique and defined criteria were easily applied to all subjects. All symptomatic patients had heartburn and were taking proton pump inhibitors (PPI). No asymptomatic patients were taking PPI. All diagnoses established with combined conventional testing were detected on EUS with upper endoscopy. Additionally, EUS resolved the etiology of a low lower esophageal sphincter pressure in two symptomatic patients and detected the additional diagnoses of slippage in two subjects. Among asymptomatic subjects, EUS identified additional diagnoses in two subjects considered to be normal by conventional testing methods.
CONCLUSION: According to the findings, EUS is a feasible method for evaluating post-Nissen fundoplication hiatal anatomic relationships. The combination of EUS and EGD allows the mechanism of failure to be detected in patients presenting with postoperative symptoms after Nissen fundoplication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17345143     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9234-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  17 in total

1.  Laparoscopic fundoplication failures: patterns of failure and response to fundoplication revision.

Authors:  J G Hunter; C D Smith; G D Branum; J P Waring; T L Trus; M Cornwell; K Galloway
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Supraesophageal reflux: validation of a symptom questionnaire.

Authors:  E Dauer; D Thompson; A R Zinsmeister; R Dierkhising; A Harris; T Zais; J Alexander; J A Murray; J L Wise; K Lim; G R Locke; Yvonne Romero
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  EUS characteristics of Nissen fundoplication: normal appearance and mechanisms of failure.

Authors:  Deepak V Gopal; Eugene Y Chang; Charles Y Kim; Corinne Sandone; Patrick R Pfau; Terrence J Frick; John G Hunter; Peter J Kahrilas; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 4.  Management of the failed antireflux operation.

Authors:  R A Hinder; P J Klingler; G Perdikis; S L Smith
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Failed antireflux surgery: what have we learned from reoperations?

Authors:  S Horgan; D Pohl; D Bogetti; T Eubanks; C Pellegrini
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-08

6.  The examiner's learning effect and its influence on the quality of endoscopic ultrasonography in carcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia.

Authors:  T Schlick; A Heintz; T Junginger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Clinical results of laparoscopic fundoplication at ten years after surgery.

Authors:  B Dallemagne; J Weerts; S Markiewicz; J-M Dewandre; C Wahlen; B Monami; C Jehaes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Surgical management after failed antireflux operations.

Authors:  D B Skinner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Laparoscopic reoperation following failed antireflux surgery.

Authors:  D I Watson; G G Jamieson; P A Game; R S Williams; P G Devitt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  High interobserver variability in endosonographic staging of upper gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  A Meining; T Rösch; A Wolf; R Lorenz; H D Allescher; W Kauer; H J Dittler
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.000

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic Evaluation of Post-Fundoplication Anatomy.

Authors:  Walaa F Abdelmoaty; Lee L Swanstrom
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-08-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.