| Literature DB >> 17342250 |
Abstract
To study the efficacy of electro-acupuncture for the relief of labor pain, and to build a better understanding of how electro-acupuncture might influence the neuroendocrine system, 36 primiparas were randomly divided into an electro-acupuncture group and a control group. Assessments of pain intensity and degree of relaxation during labor were analyzed. The differences between the electro-acupuncture group and the control group on the concentration of beta-endorphin (beta-EP) and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) in the peripheral blood were compared. The electro-acupuncture group was found to exhibit a lower pain intensity and a better degree of relaxation than the control group (p = 0.018; p = 0.031). There existed a significant difference in the concentration of beta-EP and 5-HT in the peripheral blood between the two groups at the end of the first stage (p = 0.037; p = 0.030). Electro-acupuncture was found to be an effective alternative or complementary therapy in the relief of pain during labor. The benefit of electro-acupuncture for relieving labor pain may be based on the mechanism of producing a synergism of the central nervous system (CNS) with a direct impact on the uterus through increasing the release of beta-EP and 5-HT into the peripheral blood.Entities:
Year: 2006 PMID: 17342250 PMCID: PMC1810361 DOI: 10.1093/ecam/nel053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1.Study design
Characteristics of the primiparas participating in the study
| Item | Electro-acupuncture group (n = 18) | Control group (n = 18) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal age (year) | 28.7 ± 3.1 | 28.9 ± 2.9 | 0.436 |
| Weight (Kg) | 78.2 ± 9.4 | 77.9 ± 9.6 | 0.940 |
| Gestational age (weeks) | 39.6 ± 1.1 | 39.9 ± 0.9 | 0.261 |
| Cervical dilation at admission (cm) | 3.5 ± 0.8 | 3.4 ± 1.1 | 0.398 |
Ranks:Pain assessment and degree of relaxation at admission (prior to any intervention)
| Item | Group | n | Mean Rank | Sum of Ranks | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pain | Electroacupuncture group | 18 | 17.97 | 323.50 | 0.767 |
| Score | Control group | 18 | 19.03 | 342.50 | |
| (0–10) | Total | 36 | |||
| Relaxation | Electroacupuncture group | 18 | 18.00 | 324.00 | 0.791 |
| Score | Control group | 18 | 19.00 | 342.00 | |
| (0–10) | Total | 36 |
Note:*0 defined as no pain / quite relaxed; 10 defined as worst pain imaginable/extremely tensed.
Ranks: Rating of in-labor pain and relaxation in the two groups
| Item | Group | n | Mean Rank | Sum of Ranks | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pain | Electro-acupuncture group | 18 | 14.33 | 258.00 | |
| Score | Control group | 18 | 22.67 | 408.00 | |
| (0–10) | Total | 36 | |||
| Relaxation | Electro-acupuncture group | 18 | 14.72 | 265.00 | |
| Score | Control group | 18 | 22.28 | 401.00 | |
| (0–10) | Total | 36 |
Note: *0 defined as no pain/quite relaxed; 10 defined as worst pain imaginable/extremely tensed.
Bolded items show statistically significant results.
Group Comparison: β-EP (ng/ml)
| Electro-acupuncture group (n = 18) | Control group (n = 18) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| At the beginning of the active phase | 1119.61 ± 381.29 | 1061.46 ± 421.23 | 0.695 |
| At the end of the first stage | 1597.90 ± 275.69 | 1313.45 ± 521.01 |
Note: Bolded items show statistically significant results.
Group Comparison: 5-HT (ng/ml)
| Electro-acupuncture group (n = 18) | Control group (n = 18) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| At the beginning of the active phase | 1917.01 ± 510.97 | 2068.72 ± 568.71 | 0.474 |
| At the end of the first stage | 2501.32 ± 890.16 | 2099.19 ± 675.41 |
Note: Bolded items show statistically significant results.