A R Al-Nuaim1, S Mirdad, K Al-Rubeaan, Y Al-Mazrou, O Al-Attas, N Al-Daghari. 1. Department of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, Department of Biochemistry, King Saud University, and Department of Preventive Medicine, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The pattern and factors which can be associated with the glycemic control of Saudi adult diabetic patients were examined in this study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Confirmed diabetic patients from all regions of Saudi Arabia constituted the study population. Random blood glucose <10 mmol/L and >10 mmol/L was used to categorize patients into good and poor glycemic control patients, respectively. RESULTS: There were 613 confirmed non-insulin dependent diabetic patients (NIDDM), 50% with good glycemic control. Patients with poor glycemic control were significantly older than patients with good glycemic control (51.5 vs. 47 years, P=0.0001). The insulin-treated diabetic population amounted to 13%, compared with 43% and 44% for oral agent and diet, respectively. The rate of insulin users among poor glycemic control diabetic population was 18%, compared with 50% for oral agents. There was a significant relationship between glycemic control and age, and treatment modalities of DM. Subjects who had good glycemic control of DM were younger and following a diet regimen, while those who had poor glycemic control were older and on insulin treatment. Multivariate analysis comprising 415 individuals was conducted to find out the factors that can potentially influence, or may be associated with, the control of DM. CONCLUSION: The association of insulin therapy with poor glycemic control is not a cause-effect relationship. Insulin therapy in our study population is underutilized, given the high rate of poor glycemic control and high rate of relative occurrence of complication among the Saudi diabetic population. There is a need to address the importance of maintaining good glycemic control, and the reason for the low rate of insulin users. Close periodic monitoring of glycemic control, utilizing laboratories and home glucose monitoring devices, is required. Effective implementation of these measures, in addition to diabetes education, will have an impact on the future outcome of the Saudi diabetic population.
BACKGROUND: The pattern and factors which can be associated with the glycemic control of Saudi adult diabeticpatients were examined in this study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Confirmed diabeticpatients from all regions of Saudi Arabia constituted the study population. Random blood glucose <10 mmol/L and >10 mmol/L was used to categorize patients into good and poor glycemic control patients, respectively. RESULTS: There were 613 confirmed non-insulin dependent diabeticpatients (NIDDM), 50% with good glycemic control. Patients with poor glycemic control were significantly older than patients with good glycemic control (51.5 vs. 47 years, P=0.0001). The insulin-treated diabetic population amounted to 13%, compared with 43% and 44% for oral agent and diet, respectively. The rate of insulin users among poor glycemic control diabetic population was 18%, compared with 50% for oral agents. There was a significant relationship between glycemic control and age, and treatment modalities of DM. Subjects who had good glycemic control of DM were younger and following a diet regimen, while those who had poor glycemic control were older and on insulin treatment. Multivariate analysis comprising 415 individuals was conducted to find out the factors that can potentially influence, or may be associated with, the control of DM. CONCLUSION: The association of insulin therapy with poor glycemic control is not a cause-effect relationship. Insulin therapy in our study population is underutilized, given the high rate of poor glycemic control and high rate of relative occurrence of complication among the Saudi diabetic population. There is a need to address the importance of maintaining good glycemic control, and the reason for the low rate of insulin users. Close periodic monitoring of glycemic control, utilizing laboratories and home glucose monitoring devices, is required. Effective implementation of these measures, in addition to diabetes education, will have an impact on the future outcome of the Saudi diabetic population.
Authors: Ayman A Al Hayek; Asirvatham A Robert; Abdulghani Al Saeed; Aus A Alzaid; Fahad S Al Sabaan Journal: Diabetes Metab J Date: 2014-06-17 Impact factor: 5.376