OBJECTIVE: Research in practice-based research networks (PBRNs) is hampered by difficulty managing, identifying, and enrolling potential subjects. Well-designed informatics applications can greatly improve these processes. METHODS: We considered a literature review, discussion with PBRN researchers, and personal experience to outline important principles to apply when considering electronic data collection in a PBRN. We provide specific working examples of electronic means we use to improve data collection and patient enrollment. RESULTS: Our PBRN has screened more than 18,000 patients and enrolled more than 6000 study subjects in 5 years. Less than 2% of potentially eligible patients are missed by our research assistants. We achieved this high rate of success through extensive integration of the ResNet infrastructure (research databases and personnel) with an electronic medical record (EMR) system and computerized provider order entry. We make extensive use of widely used standards for data storage, definition, and transmission to ensure data reusability. We successfully implemented a real-time means to identify follow-up patients. CONCLUSION: Electronic data collection can greatly facilitate PBRN research, particularly by improving data management and identification of eligible patients. Key principles to ensure successful implementation include use of data standards and centralized electronic data management.
OBJECTIVE: Research in practice-based research networks (PBRNs) is hampered by difficulty managing, identifying, and enrolling potential subjects. Well-designed informatics applications can greatly improve these processes. METHODS: We considered a literature review, discussion with PBRN researchers, and personal experience to outline important principles to apply when considering electronic data collection in a PBRN. We provide specific working examples of electronic means we use to improve data collection and patient enrollment. RESULTS: Our PBRN has screened more than 18,000 patients and enrolled more than 6000 study subjects in 5 years. Less than 2% of potentially eligible patients are missed by our research assistants. We achieved this high rate of success through extensive integration of the ResNet infrastructure (research databases and personnel) with an electronic medical record (EMR) system and computerized provider order entry. We make extensive use of widely used standards for data storage, definition, and transmission to ensure data reusability. We successfully implemented a real-time means to identify follow-up patients. CONCLUSION: Electronic data collection can greatly facilitate PBRN research, particularly by improving data management and identification of eligible patients. Key principles to ensure successful implementation include use of data standards and centralized electronic data management.
Authors: John Hickner; Atif Zafar; Grace M Kuo; Lyle J Fagnan; Samuel N Forjuoh; Lyndee M Knox; John T Lynch; Brian Kelly Stevens; Wilson D Pace; Benjamin N Hamlin; Hilary Scherer; Brenda L Hudson; Caitlin Carroll Oppenheimer; William M Tierney Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Denise M Hynes; Timothy Weddle; Nina Smith; Erika Whittier; David Atkins; Joseph Francis Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Titus Schleyer; Mei Song; Gregg H Gilbert; D Brad Rindal; Jeffrey L Fellows; Valeria V Gordan; Ellen Funkhouser Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 3.634
Authors: Steven R Offerman; Adina S Rauchwerger; Daniel K Nishijima; Dustin W Ballard; Uli K Chettipally; David R Vinson; Mary E Reed; James F Holmes Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2013-03