Literature DB >> 17341712

Major and minor ECG abnormalities in asymptomatic women and risk of cardiovascular events and mortality.

Pablo Denes1, Joseph C Larson, Donald M Lloyd-Jones, Ronald J Prineas, Philip Greenland.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Data are sparse regarding the prevalence, incidence, and independent prognostic value of minor and/or major electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. There is no information on the effect, if any, of hormonal treatment on the prognostic value of the ECG.
OBJECTIVE: To examine association of minor and major baseline and incident ECG abnormalities with long-term cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Post-hoc analysis of the estrogen plus progestin component of the Women's Health Initiative study, a randomized controlled primary prevention trial of 14 749 postmenopausal asymptomatic women with intact uterus who received 1 daily tablet containing 0.625 mg of oral conjugated equine estrogen and 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate or a matching placebo. Participants were enrolled from 1993 to 1998, and the estrogen plus progestin trial was stopped on July 7, 2002. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Novacode criteria were used to define minor, major, and incident ECG abnormalities. Cardiovascular end points included incident coronary heart disease (CHD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) events.
RESULTS: Among women with absent (n = 9744), minor (n = 4095), and major (n = 910) ECG abnormalities, there were 118, 91, and 37 incident CHD events, respectively. The incident annual CHD event rates per 10 000 women with absent, minor, or major ECG abnormalities were 21 (95% confidence interval [CI], 18-26), 40 (95% CI, 32-49), and 75 (95% CI, 54-104), respectively. After 3 years of follow-up, 5% of women who had normal ECG at baseline developed new ECG abnormalities with an annual CHD event rate of 85 (95% CI, 44-164) per 10 000 women. The adjusted hazard ratios for CHD events were 1.55 (95% CI, 1.14-2.11) for minor baseline, 3.01 (95% CI, 2.03-4.46) for major baseline, and 2.60 (95% CI, 1.08-6.27) for incident ECG abnormalities. There were no significant interactions between hormone treatment assignment and ECG abnormalities for risk prediction of cardiovascular end points. For prediction of CHD events, the addition of ECG findings to the Framingham risk score increased from 0.69 to 0.74 the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Similar findings were found for incident CVD events.
CONCLUSIONS: Among asymptomatic postmenopausal women, clinically relevant baseline and incident ECG abnormalities are independently associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality, and the information is incremental to the established method of risk stratification. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000611.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17341712     DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.9.978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  38 in total

1.  The year of 2007 in electrocardiology.

Authors:  Shlomo Stern
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  The clinical utility of normal findings on noninvasive cardiac assessment in the prediction of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Sanjay Venkatesh; Wesley T O'Neal; Stephen T Broughton; Amit J Shah; Elsayed Z Soliman
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Utility of Normal Findings on Electrocardiogram and Echocardiogram in Subjects ≥65 Years.

Authors:  Sanjay Venkatesh; Wesley T O'Neal; Stephen T Broughton; Amit J Shah; Elsayed Z Soliman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Electrocardiographic abnormalities associated with the metabolic syndrome and its components: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Imo A Ebong; Alain G Bertoni; Elsayed Z Soliman; Mengye Guo; Christopher T Sibley; Yii-Der I Chen; Jerome I Rotter; Yi-Chun Chen; David C Goff
Journal:  Metab Syndr Relat Disord       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 1.894

5.  Major and minor electrocardiographic abnormalities and their association with underlying cardiovascular disease and risk factors in Hispanics/Latinos (from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos).

Authors:  Pablo Denes; Daniel B Garside; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Natalia Gouskova; Elsayed Z Soliman; Robert Ostfeld; Zhu-Ming Zhang; Alvaro Camacho; Ronald Prineas; Leopoldo Raij; Martha L Daviglus
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Use of hundreds of electrocardiographic biomarkers for prediction of mortality in postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Eiran Z Gorodeski; Hemant Ishwaran; Udaya B Kogalur; Eugene H Blackstone; Eileen Hsich; Zhu-Ming Zhang; Mara Z Vitolins; Joann E Manson; J David Curb; Lisa W Martin; Ronald J Prineas; Michael S Lauer
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2011-08-23

7.  Left ventricular hypertrophy and cardiovascular mortality by race and ethnicity.

Authors:  Edward P Havranek; Desiree B Froshaug; Caroline D B Emserman; Rebecca Hanratty; Mori J Krantz; Frederick A Masoudi; L Miriam Dickinson; John F Steiner
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Variable association between components of the metabolic syndrome and electrocardiographic abnormalities in Korean adults.

Authors:  Hong-Kyu Kim; Chul-Hee Kim; Kwan-Ho Ko; Seong-Wook Park; Joong-Yeol Park; Ki-Up Lee
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.165

9.  Prevalence of electrocardiographic abnormalities based on hypertension severity and blood pressure levels: the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke study.

Authors:  Hemal Bhatt; Christopher M Gamboa; Monika M Safford; Elsayed Z Soliman; Stephen P Glasser
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2016-06-27

Review 10.  Hypertension: reflections on risks and prognostication.

Authors:  William B Kannel
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.456

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.