Literature DB >> 17341400

Dispersion of repolarization in canine ventricle and the electrocardiographic T wave: Tp-e interval does not reflect transmural dispersion.

Tobias Opthof1, Ruben Coronel, Francien J G Wilms-Schopman, Alexei N Plotnikov, Iryna N Shlapakova, Peter Danilo, Michael R Rosen, Michiel J Janse.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The concept that the interval between the peak (T(peak)) and the end (T(end)) of the T wave (T(p-e)) is a measure of transmural dispersion of repolarization time is widely accepted but has not been tested rigorously by transmural mapping of the intact heart.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to test the relationship of T(p-e) to transmural dispersion of repolarization by correlating local repolarization times at endocardial, midmural, and epicardial sites in the left and right ventricles with the T wave of the ECG.
METHODS: Local activation times, activation-recovery intervals, and repolarization times were measured at 98 epicardial sites and up to 120 midmural and endocardial sites in eight open-chest dogs. In four of the dogs, long-term cardiac memory was induced by 3 weeks of ventricular pacing at 130 bpm because previous data suggest that, in this setting, delayed epicardial repolarization increases transmural dispersion. The other four dogs were sham operated.
RESULTS: In sham dogs, T(p-e) was 41 +/- 2.2 ms (X +/- SEM), whereas the transmural dispersion of repolarization time was 2.7 +/- 4.2 ms (not significant between endocardium and epicardium). Cardiac memory was associated with evolution of a transmural gradient of 14.5 +/- 1.9 ms (P <.02), with epicardium repolarizing later than endocardium. The corresponding T(p-e) was 43 +/- 2.3 ms (not different from sham). In combined sham and memory dogs, T(p-e) intervals did not correlate with transmural dispersion of repolarization times. In contrast, dispersion of repolarization of the whole heart (measured as the difference between the earliest and the latest moment of repolarization from all left and right ventricular, endocardial, intramural, and epicardial recording sites) did correlate with T(p-e) (P <.0005, r = 0.98), although the latter underestimated total repolarization time by approximately 35%. The explanation for this finding is that parts of the heart fully repolarize before the moment of T(peak).
CONCLUSION: T(p-e) does not correlate with transmural dispersion of repolarization but is an index of total dispersion of repolarization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17341400     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.11.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  75 in total

1.  β-blockers protect against dispersion of repolarization during exercise in congenital long-QT syndrome type 1.

Authors:  Lee W Gemma; Gregory M Ward; Mary M Dettmer; Jennifer L Ball; Peter J Leo; Danielle N Doria; Elizabeth S Kaufman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-06-02

2.  Repolarization changes underlying long-term cardiac memory due to right ventricular pacing: noninvasive mapping with electrocardiographic imaging.

Authors:  Scott B Marrus; Christopher M Andrews; Daniel H Cooper; Mitchell N Faddis; Yoram Rudy
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-07-06

Review 3.  Drug-induced long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Prince Kannankeril; Dan M Roden; Dawood Darbar
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 25.468

4.  The T-peak-T-end interval as a marker of repolarization abnormality: a comparison with the QT interval for five different drugs.

Authors:  Tanveer A Bhuiyan; Claus Graff; Jørgen K Kanters; Jimmi Nielsen; Jacob Melgaard; Jørgen Matz; Egon Toft; Johannes J Struijk
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 5.  The 12-lead electrocardiogram and risk of sudden death: current utility and future prospects.

Authors:  Kumar Narayanan; Sumeet S Chugh
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.214

6.  Does Tpeak-Tend provide an index of transmural dispersion of repolarization?

Authors:  Charles Antzelevitch; Serge Sicouri; José M Di Diego; Alexander Burashnikov; Sami Viskin; Wataru Shimizu; Gan-Xin Yan; Peter Kowey; Li Zhang
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 6.343

7.  The terminal part of the QT interval (T peak to T end): a predictor of mortality after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Gunnar Erikssen; Knut Liestøl; Lars Gullestad; Kristina H Haugaa; Bjørn Bendz; Jan P Amlie
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 8.  Identifying genetic risk factors for serious adverse drug reactions: current progress and challenges.

Authors:  Russell A Wilke; Debbie W Lin; Dan M Roden; Paul B Watkins; David Flockhart; Issam Zineh; Kathleen M Giacomini; Ronald M Krauss
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 9.  Drug-induced spatial dispersion of repolarization.

Authors:  Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.737

10.  Indexes of temporal myocardial repolarization dispersion and sudden cardiac death in heart failure: any difference?

Authors:  Gianfranco Piccirillo; Pietro Rossi; Marilena Mitra; Raffaele Quaglione; Annalaura Dell'Armi; Daniele Di Barba; Damiana Maisto; Andrea Lizio; Francesco Barillà; Damiano Magrì
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 1.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.