Literature DB >> 17341383

Electrophysiological and arrhythmogenic effects of intramyocardial bone marrow cell injection in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease.

Saskia L M A Beeres1, Katja Zeppenfeld, Jeroen J Bax, Petra Dibbets-Schneider, Marcel P M Stokkel, Willem E Fibbe, Ernst E van der Wall, Douwe E Atsma, Martin J Schalij.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bone marrow cell injection has been introduced to treat patients with ischemic heart disease. However, focal application of bone marrow cells may generate an arrhythmogenic substrate.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the electrophysiological and arrhythmogenic effects of intramyocardial bone marrow cell injection in patients with chronic myocardial ischemia.
METHODS: Bone marrow was aspirated in 20 patients (65+/-11 years, 19 male) with drug-refractory angina and myocardial ischemia. Electroanatomical mapping (NOGA, Biosense-Webster, Waterloo, Belgium) was performed during mononuclear cell isolation. Areas for cell injection were selected based on the localization of ischemia on SPECT. These areas were mapped in detail to evaluate local bipolar electrogram duration, amplitude and fragmentation. Mononuclear cells were injected in the ischemic area with the NOGA system. SPECT and electroanatomical mapping were repeated at 3 months. Holter monitoring was repeated at 3 and 6 months.
RESULTS: SPECT revealed a decrease in the number of segments with ischemia (3.5+/-2.5 vs. 1.1+/-1.0 at 3 months; P<0.01) and an increased left ventricular ejection fraction (44+/-13% vs. 49+/-17% at 3 months; P=0.02). The number of ventricular premature beats remained unchanged (10+/-24x10(2)/24h vs. 8+/-23x10(2)/24h at 3 months (P=NS) and 12+/-30x10(2)/24h at 6 months (P=NS)). At 3 months follow-up, bone marrow cell injection did not prolong electrogram duration (15.9+/-4.6 ms vs. 15.6+/-4.0 ms; P=NS), decrease electrogram amplitude (3.8+/-1.5 mV vs. 3.8+/-1.5 mV; P=NS), or increase fragmentation (2.0+/-0.5 vs. 1.9+/-0.4; P=NS).
CONCLUSION: Intramyocardial bone marrow cell injection does not increase the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias and does not alter the electrophysiological properties of the injected myocardium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17341383     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.10.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  12 in total

Review 1.  Delivery of gene and cellular therapies for heart disease.

Authors:  Justin A Mariani; David M Kaye
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Intramyocardial navigation and mapping for stem cell delivery.

Authors:  Peter J Psaltis; Andrew C W Zannettino; Stan Gronthos; Stephen G Worthley
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Intracoronary delivery of mesenchymal stem cells reduces proarrhythmogenic risks in swine with myocardial infarction.

Authors:  D Wang; Y Jin; C Ding; F Zhang; M Chen; B Yang; Q Shan; J Zou; K Cao
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Cardiomyocytes from phorbol myristate acetate-activated mesenchymal stem cells restore electromechanical function in infarcted rat hearts.

Authors:  Heesang Song; Hye Jin Hwang; Woochul Chang; Byeong-Wook Song; Min-Ji Cha; Il-Kwon Kim; Soyeon Lim; Eun Ju Choi; Onju Ham; Chang Youn Lee; Jun-Hee Park; Se-Yeon Lee; Eunmi Choi; Chungkeun Lee; Myoungho Lee; Moon-Hyoung Lee; Sung-Hou Kim; Yangsoo Jang; Ki-Chul Hwang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Bone marrow cell injection for chronic myocardial ischemia: the past and the future.

Authors:  Jan van Ramshorst; Sander F Rodrigo; Martin J Schalij; Saskia L M A Beeres; Jeroen J Bax; Douwe E Atsma
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 6.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of 3D NOGA mapping in ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Mariann Gyöngyösi; Nabil Dib
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 7.  Stem cell therapy is proarrhythmic.

Authors:  Ester Macia; Penelope A Boyden
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Effects of Transendocardial Stem Cell Injection on Ventricular Proarrhythmia in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Results from the POSEIDON and TAC-HFT Trials.

Authors:  Archana Ramireddy; Chad R Brodt; Adam M Mendizabal; Darcy L DiFede; Chris Healy; Vishal Goyal; Yahya Alansari; James O Coffey; Juan F Viles-Gonzalez; Alan W Heldman; Jeffrey J Goldberger; Robert J Myerburg; Joshua M Hare; Raul D Mitrani
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 6.940

9.  Transendocardial CD34+ Cell Therapy does not Increase the Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.

Authors:  Gregor Poglajen; Gregor Zemljič; Andraž Cerar; Sabina Frljak; Martina Jaklič; Vesna Androcec; Bojan Vrtovec
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 10.  Potential and clinical utility of stem cells in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Korff Krause; Carsten Schneider; Kai Jaquet; Karl-Heinz Kuck
Journal:  Stem Cells Cloning       Date:  2010-03-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.