Literature DB >> 17341139

Performance-based measures: the early results are in.

Margaret E O'Kane1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pay for performance (P4P) initiatives are designed to foster and reward improvement in health care delivery. These programs promote "value-based health care" by rewarding quality care that is characterized by a reduced amount of disproportionate spending.
OBJECTIVE: To review the intent and design of P4P initiatives as well as the design and results of P4P programs in current practice.
SUMMARY: Three key principles are fundamental to building a value-based health care system: measurement, transparency, and accountability. There are several levers currently driving P4P, each influencing the movement in its own way. Among these are employers, federal agencies such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and the Department of Health and Human Services, health plans, providers, accreditors, and Congress. One key player in the P4P movement, the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), is a private, independent nonprofit health care quality oversight organization that measures and reports on health care quality and unites diverse groups around a common goal: improving health care quality. NCQA, has demonstrated several successful provider-level measurement initiatives connected to P4P programs, notable among them Bridges to Excellence programs in several markets, physician recognition programs, the Integrated Healthcare Association's P4P initiative in California, the National Forum on Performance Benchmarking of Physician Offices and Organizations, and health plan accreditation.
CONCLUSIONS: The initial data from developmental P4P programs across the nation have indicated that both financial and nonfinancial incentives motivate significant change in health care delivery, but the return on investment of these initiatives is not yet known.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17341139     DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2007.13.s2-b.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm        ISSN: 1083-4087


  6 in total

Review 1.  Hospital do-not-resuscitate orders: why they have failed and how to fix them.

Authors:  Jacqueline K Yuen; M Carrington Reid; Michael D Fetters
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Economic evaluation of pay-for-performance in health care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Martin Emmert; Frank Eijkenaar; Heike Kemter; Adelheid Susanne Esslinger; Oliver Schöffski
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-06-10

Review 3.  Quality health care gaps in osteoporosis: how can patients, providers, and the health system do a better job?

Authors:  Gim Gee Teng; Jeffrey R Curtis; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 4.  Improving quality of care in osteoporosis: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Gim Gee Teng; Amy Warriner; Jeffrey R Curtis; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.592

5.  Payment for performance (P4P): any future in Italy?

Authors:  Silvana Castaldi; Annalisa Bodina; Luciana Bevilacqua; Elena Parravicini; Michaela Bertuzzi; Francesco Auxilia
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Protocol for the evaluation of a pay for performance programme in Pwani region in Tanzania: a controlled before and after study.

Authors:  Josephine Borghi; Iddy Mayumana; Irene Mashasi; Peter Binyaruka; Edith Patouillard; Ikunda Njau; Ottar Maestad; Salim Abdulla; Masuma Mamdani
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 7.327

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.