Literature DB >> 17340598

Hierarchical models for ROC curve summary measures: design and analysis of multi-reader, multi-modality studies of medical tests.

Fei Wang1, Constantine A Gatsonis.   

Abstract

Comparative studies of the accuracy of diagnostic tests often involve designs according to which each study participant is examined by two or more of the tests and the diagnostic examinations are interpreted by several readers. Tests are then compared on the basis of a summary index, such as the (full or partial) area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, averaged over the population of readers. The design and analysis of such studies naturally need to take into account the correlated nature of the diagnostic test results and interpretations. In this paper, we describe the use of hierarchical modelling for ROC summary measures derived from multi-reader, multi-modality studies. The models allow the variance of the estimates to depend on the actual value of the index and account for the correlation in the data both explicitly via parameters and implicitly via the hierarchical structure. After showing how the hierarchical models can be employed in the analysis of data from multi-reader, multi-modality studies, we discuss the design of such studies using the simulation-based, Bayesian design approach of Wang and Gelfand (Stat. Sci. 2002; 17(2):193-208). The methodology is illustrated via the analysis of data from a study conducted to evaluate a computer-aided diagnosis tool for screen film mammography and via the development of design considerations for a multi-reader study comparing display modes for digital mammography. The hierarchical model methodology described in this paper is also applicable to the meta-analysis of ROC studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17340598     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  10 in total

1.  Evaluating imaging and computer-aided detection and diagnosis devices at the FDA.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas; Heang-Ping Chan; Carl J D'Orsi; Lori E Dodd; Maryellen L Giger; David Gur; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Charles E Metz; Kyle J Myers; Nancy A Obuchowski; Berkman Sahiner; Alicia Y Toledano; Margarita L Zuley
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Modeling rater diagnostic skills in binary classification processes.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Lin; Hua Chen; Don Edwards; Kerrie P Nelson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Diagnostic performance of CT angiography in neck vessel trauma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carlos Morales-Uribe; Ana Ramírez; Tatiana Suarez-Poveda; Margarita Ortiz; Alvaro Sanabria
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-06-01

4.  Accuracy of i-Scan for Optical Diagnosis of Colonic Polyps: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chuan-Guo Guo; Rui Ji; Yan-Qing Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Effectiveness of the apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting the response to chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Haiting Xie; Tao Sun; Ming Chen; Hao Wang; Xin Zhou; Yunkai Zhang; Huanhong Zeng; Jilian Wang; Wei Fu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Investigating the accuracy, risk impact, and cost-effectiveness of component-resolved diagnostic test for food allergy: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Javier Flores Kim; Bright I Nwaru; Nicola McCleary; Andrew Stoddart; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  NPJ Prim Care Respir Med       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.871

Review 7.  The Accuracies of Diagnosing Pancreas Divisum by Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography and Endoscopic Ultrasound: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhe Shen; Stefan Munker; Boyan Zhou; Lin Li; Chaohui Yu; Youming Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Narrow band imaging to differentiate neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal polyps in real time: a meta-analysis of diagnostic operating characteristics.

Authors:  Sarah K McGill; Evangelos Evangelou; John P A Ioannidis; Roy M Soetikno; Tonya Kaltenbach
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  The diagnostic value of the FIB-4 index for staging hepatitis B-related fibrosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Li; Yu Chen; Ying Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Are All Pulse Sequences Helpful?

Authors:  Xiao-Li Liao; Jun-Bao Wei; Yong-Qiang Li; Jian-Hong Zhong; Cheng-Cheng Liao; Chang-Yuan Wei
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.500

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.