Literature DB >> 17339881

Gene therapy progress and prospects: ultrasound for gene transfer.

C M H Newman1, T Bettinger.   

Abstract

Ultrasound exposure (USE) in the presence of microbubbles (MCB) (e.g. contrast agents used to enhance ultrasound imaging) increases plasmid transfection efficiency in vitro by several orders of magnitude. Formation of short-lived pores in the plasma membrane ('sonoporation'), up to 100 nm in effective diameter lasting a few seconds, is implicated as the dominant mechanism, associated with acoustic cavitation. Ultrasound enhanced gene transfer (UEGT) has also been successfully achieved in vivo, with reports of spatially restricted and therapeutically relevant levels of transgene expression. Loading MCB with nucleic acids and/or disease-targeting ligands may further improve the efficiency and specificity of UEGT such that clinical testing becomes a realistic prospect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17339881     DOI: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene Ther        ISSN: 0969-7128            Impact factor:   5.250


  96 in total

1.  Ultrasound-enhanced drug transport and distribution in the brain.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Sumit Paliwal; Krystof S Bankiewicz; John R Bringas; Gill Heart; Samir Mitragotri; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  Passive imaging with pulsed ultrasound insonations.

Authors:  Kevin J Haworth; T Douglas Mast; Kirthi Radhakrishnan; Mark T Burgess; Jonathan A Kopechek; Shao-Ling Huang; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A model for the dynamics of ultrasound contrast agents in vivo.

Authors:  Shengping Qin; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Gene transfer: how can the biological barriers be overcome?

Authors:  Jean-Michel Escoffre; Justin Teissié; Marie-Pierre Rols
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 1.843

5.  Cationic versus neutral microbubbles for ultrasound-mediated gene delivery in cancer.

Authors:  David S Wang; Cedric Panje; Marybeth A Pysz; Ramasamy Paulmurugan; Jarrett Rosenberg; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Michel Schneider; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Dynamics of sonoporation correlated with acoustic cavitation activities.

Authors:  Yun Zhou; Jianmin Cui; Cheri X Deng
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Gene therapy, early promises, subsequent problems, and recent breakthroughs.

Authors:  Saeideh Razi Soofiyani; Behzad Baradaran; Farzaneh Lotfipour; Tohid Kazemi; Leila Mohammadnejad
Journal:  Adv Pharm Bull       Date:  2013-08-20

8.  Insight concerning the mechanism of therapeutic ultrasound facilitating gene delivery: increasing cell membrane permeability or interfering with intracellular pathways?

Authors:  Maayan Duvshani-Eshet; Tom Haber; Marcelle Machluf
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 5.695

Review 9.  Physical non-viral gene delivery methods for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Adam J Mellott; M Laird Forrest; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Spatial specificity and sensitivity of passive cavitation imaging for monitoring high-intensity focused ultrasound thermal ablation in ex vivo bovine liver.

Authors:  Kevin Haworth; Vasant A Salgaonkar; Nicholas M Corregan; Christy K Holland; T D Mast
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2013-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.