BACKGROUND: Telemonitoring, the use of communication technology to remotely monitor health status, is an appealing strategy for improving disease management. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched Medline databases, bibliographies, and spoke with experts to review the evidence on telemonitoring in heart failure patients. Interventions included: telephone-based symptom monitoring (n = 5), automated monitoring of signs and symptoms (n = 1), and automated physiologic monitoring (n = 1). Two studies directly compared effectiveness of 2 or more forms of telemonitoring. Study quality and intervention type varied considerably. Six studies suggested reduction in all-cause and heart failure hospitalizations (14% to 55% and 29% to 43%, respectively) or mortality (40% to 56%) with telemonitoring. Of the 3 negative studies, 2 enrolled low-risk patients and patients with access to high quality care, whereas 1 enrolled a very high-risk Hispanic population. Studies comparing forms of telemonitoring demonstrated similar effectiveness. However, intervention costs were higher with more complex programs (8383 dollars per patient per year) versus less complex programs (1695 dollars per patient per year). CONCLUSION: The evidence base for telemonitoring in heart failure is currently quite limited. Based on the available data, telemonitoring may be an effective strategy for disease management in high-risk heart failure patients.
BACKGROUND: Telemonitoring, the use of communication technology to remotely monitor health status, is an appealing strategy for improving disease management. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched Medline databases, bibliographies, and spoke with experts to review the evidence on telemonitoring in heart failurepatients. Interventions included: telephone-based symptom monitoring (n = 5), automated monitoring of signs and symptoms (n = 1), and automated physiologic monitoring (n = 1). Two studies directly compared effectiveness of 2 or more forms of telemonitoring. Study quality and intervention type varied considerably. Six studies suggested reduction in all-cause and heart failure hospitalizations (14% to 55% and 29% to 43%, respectively) or mortality (40% to 56%) with telemonitoring. Of the 3 negative studies, 2 enrolled low-risk patients and patients with access to high quality care, whereas 1 enrolled a very high-risk Hispanic population. Studies comparing forms of telemonitoring demonstrated similar effectiveness. However, intervention costs were higher with more complex programs (8383 dollars per patient per year) versus less complex programs (1695 dollars per patient per year). CONCLUSION: The evidence base for telemonitoring in heart failure is currently quite limited. Based on the available data, telemonitoring may be an effective strategy for disease management in high-risk heart failurepatients.
Authors: Anthony A Cavallerano; Jerry D Cavallerano; Paula Katalinic; Beatrice Blake; Michael Rynne; Paul R Conlin; Kristen Hock; Ann Marie Tolson; Lloyd Paul Aiello; Lloyd M Aiello Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: William Claiborne Dunagan; Benjamin Littenberg; Gregory A Ewald; Catherine A Jones; Valerie Beckham Emery; Brian M Waterman; Daniel C Silverman; Joseph G Rogers Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: John G F Cleland; Amala A Louis; Alan S Rigby; Uwe Janssens; Aggie H M M Balk Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-04-22 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Robert Frank DeBusk; Nancy Houston Miller; Kathleen Marie Parker; Albert Bandura; Helena Chmura Kraemer; Daniel Joseph Cher; Jeffrey Alan West; Michael Bruce Fowler; George Greenwald Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2004-10-19 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Santanu Guha; S Harikrishnan; Saumitra Ray; Rishi Sethi; S Ramakrishnan; Suvro Banerjee; V K Bahl; K C Goswami; Amal Kumar Banerjee; S Shanmugasundaram; P G Kerkar; Sandeep Seth; Rakesh Yadav; Aditya Kapoor; Ajaykumar U Mahajan; P P Mohanan; Sundeep Mishra; P K Deb; C Narasimhan; A K Pancholia; Ajay Sinha; Akshyaya Pradhan; R Alagesan; Ambuj Roy; Amit Vora; Anita Saxena; Arup Dasbiswas; B C Srinivas; B P Chattopadhyay; B P Singh; J Balachandar; K R Balakrishnan; Brian Pinto; C N Manjunath; Charan P Lanjewar; Dharmendra Jain; Dipak Sarma; G Justin Paul; Geevar A Zachariah; H K Chopra; I B Vijayalakshmi; J A Tharakan; J J Dalal; J P S Sawhney; Jayanta Saha; Johann Christopher; K K Talwar; K Sarat Chandra; K Venugopal; Kajal Ganguly; M S Hiremath; Milind Hot; Mrinal Kanti Das; Neil Bardolui; Niteen V Deshpande; O P Yadava; Prashant Bhardwaj; Pravesh Vishwakarma; Rajeeve Kumar Rajput; Rakesh Gupta; S Somasundaram; S N Routray; S S Iyengar; G Sanjay; Satyendra Tewari; Sengottuvelu G; Soumitra Kumar; Soura Mookerjee; Tiny Nair; Trinath Mishra; U C Samal; U Kaul; V K Chopra; V S Narain; Vimal Raj; Yash Lokhandwala Journal: Indian Heart J Date: 2018-06-08
Authors: Andrew Sherwood; James A Blumenthal; Gary G Koch; Benson M Hoffman; Lana L Watkins; Patrick J Smith; Christopher M O'Connor; Kirkwood F Adams; Joseph G Rogers; Carla Sueta; Patricia P Chang; Kristy S Johnson; Jeanne Schwartz; Alan L Hinderliter Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: J Siebermair; S Clauss; E Martens; F Schuessler; N Oversohl; N Haserueck; H L Estner; S Kääb; R Wakili Journal: Herz Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 1.443
Authors: Nils Reiss; Thomas Schmidt; Michael Boeckelmann; Sebastian Schulte-Eistrup; Jan-Dirk Hoffmann; Christina Feldmann; Jan D Schmitto Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 2.895