Literature DB >> 17338996

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of high-dose HMG CoA reductase inhibitor therapy on ventricular remodeling, pro-inflammatory cytokines and neurohormonal parameters in patients with chronic systolic heart failure.

Henry Krum1, Emma Ashton, Christopher Reid, Victor Kalff, Jim Rogers, John Amarena, Bhuwan Singh, Andrew Tonkin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Statins decrease mortality in patients with coronary artery disease. However, chronic heart failure (CHF) patients were often excluded in such trials. Statins possess pharmacologic properties (independent of cholesterol lowering) that may be beneficial on ventricular remodeling in such patients. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We conducted a 6-month randomized placebo (PBO)-controlled study of rosuvastatin (ROS) in patients with systolic (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <40%) CHF of ischemic or nonischemic etiology. The primary end point was change in LVEF by radionuclide ventriculogram. Secondary end points included change in echocardiographic parameters, neurohormonal and inflammatory markers, Packer composite score, death, and heart failure hospitalization. Patients were well matched for baseline values. Compared with PBO (n = 46), ROS patients (n = 40) had a decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (PBO +3, ROS -54%, P < .001). There was no significant change in LVEF by radionuclide ventriculogram (PBO +5.3, ROS +3.2%), fractional shortening by echocardiographic (PBO +2.7, ROS +1.8%), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (PBO -1.7, ROS +0.8 mm), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (PBO -1.9, ROS +0.1 mm). Plasma norepinephrine, endothelin-1, brain natriuretic peptide, hsCRP, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6, patient global assessment, Packer composite, death/heart failure hospitalization, and adverse events were similar between PBO and ROS.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite being safe and effective at decreasing plasma cholesterol, high-dose ROS did not beneficially alter parameters of LV remodeling. Reasons for absence of benefit are uncertain, but may include patient population studied, high dose of ROS used or high use of effective background CHF medications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17338996     DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2006.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Fail        ISSN: 1071-9164            Impact factor:   5.712


  29 in total

Review 1.  Reverse remodeling in heart failure--mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Norimichi Koitabashi; David A Kass
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Potential role of statins in the treatment of heart failure.

Authors:  Stuart D Katz
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 3.  Left ventricular ejection fraction as therapeutic target: is it the ideal marker?

Authors:  V Katsi; G Georgiopoulos; A Laina; E Koutli; J Parissis; C Tsioufis; P Nihoyannopoulos; D Tousoulis
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 4.  Innate immunity and the failing heart: the cytokine hypothesis revisited.

Authors:  Douglas L Mann
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 5.  Left Ventricular Remodelling: A Problem in Search of Solutions.

Authors:  Dennis V Cokkinos; Christos Belogianneas
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2016-08

6.  Remodelling and adverse remodelling in CAD.

Authors:  S Brenner; G Ertl
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 7.  Rosuvastatin in elderly patients.

Authors:  Michael H Davidson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  To assess, to control, to exclude: effects of biobehavioral factors on circulating inflammatory markers.

Authors:  Mary-Frances O'Connor; Julie E Bower; Hyong Jin Cho; J David Creswell; Stoyan Dimitrov; Mary E Hamby; Michael A Hoyt; Jennifer L Martin; Theodore F Robles; Erica K Sloan; Kamala S Thomas; Michael R Irwin
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 7.217

9.  Pravastatin improves function in hibernating myocardium by mobilizing CD133+ and cKit+ bone marrow progenitor cells and promoting myocytes to reenter the growth phase of the cardiac cell cycle.

Authors:  Gen Suzuki; Vijay Iyer; Thomas Cimato; John M Canty
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 10.  The case for statin therapy in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Pim van der Harst; Michael Böhm; Wiek H van Gilst; Dirk J van Veldhuisen
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.