BACKGROUND: Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) transits to permanent atrial fibrillation (PEAF). The current study was to determine whether a P wave-triggered P wave signal averaged electrocardiogram (P-SAECG) and chemoreflexsensitivity (CHRS) are useful to predict a conversion to PEAF in patients with PAF. METHODS: The filtered P wave duration (FPD) and the root mean square voltage of the last 20 ms of the P wave (RMS 20) were measured by P-SAECG. The ratio between the difference of RR intervals in the ECG and venous pO2 before and after 5-minutes oxygen inhalation is measured (ms/mmHg) for the determination of CHRS. RESULTS: A total of 180 patients with PAF were enrolled and followed for a mean of 22.5 months. PEAF occurred in 38 patients (21%) and these patients had a significantly larger left atrial size (43.2 +/- 4.9 vs. 41.0 +/- 5.4 mm, P = 0.021), a significantly longer FPD (158.8 +/- 18.2 vs. 136.7 +/- 16.6 ms, P < 0.0001), and a significantly lower CHRS (1.96 +/- 0.99 vs. 2.44 +/- 1.19 ms/mmHg, P = 0.024) than patients with PAF. Patients with PEAF tended to have a lower RMS 20 (2.38 +/- 0.65 vs. 2.75 +/- 1.18 microV, P = 0.067) than patients with PAF. The chi(2) test showed that the combination of FPD > or = 145 ms, RMS 20 < or = 3.0 microV, left atrial size > or = 41 mm, and CHRS < or = 2.0 ms/mmHg had the best predictive power for PEAF. Patients who fulfilled these criteria had a 12-fold increased risk for a conversion from PAF to PEAF. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that a P-SAECG, an analysis of CHRS, and left atrial enlargement are clinical predictors of a progression from PAF to PEAF.
BACKGROUND:Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) transits to permanent atrial fibrillation (PEAF). The current study was to determine whether a P wave-triggered P wave signal averaged electrocardiogram (P-SAECG) and chemoreflexsensitivity (CHRS) are useful to predict a conversion to PEAF in patients with PAF. METHODS: The filtered P wave duration (FPD) and the root mean square voltage of the last 20 ms of the P wave (RMS 20) were measured by P-SAECG. The ratio between the difference of RR intervals in the ECG and venous pO2 before and after 5-minutes oxygen inhalation is measured (ms/mmHg) for the determination of CHRS. RESULTS: A total of 180 patients with PAF were enrolled and followed for a mean of 22.5 months. PEAF occurred in 38 patients (21%) and these patients had a significantly larger left atrial size (43.2 +/- 4.9 vs. 41.0 +/- 5.4 mm, P = 0.021), a significantly longer FPD (158.8 +/- 18.2 vs. 136.7 +/- 16.6 ms, P < 0.0001), and a significantly lower CHRS (1.96 +/- 0.99 vs. 2.44 +/- 1.19 ms/mmHg, P = 0.024) than patients with PAF. Patients with PEAF tended to have a lower RMS 20 (2.38 +/- 0.65 vs. 2.75 +/- 1.18 microV, P = 0.067) than patients with PAF. The chi(2) test showed that the combination of FPD > or = 145 ms, RMS 20 < or = 3.0 microV, left atrial size > or = 41 mm, and CHRS < or = 2.0 ms/mmHg had the best predictive power for PEAF. Patients who fulfilled these criteria had a 12-fold increased risk for a conversion from PAF to PEAF. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that a P-SAECG, an analysis of CHRS, and left atrial enlargement are clinical predictors of a progression from PAF to PEAF.
Authors: Steven A Lubitz; Emelia J Benjamin; Jeremy N Ruskin; Valentin Fuster; Patrick T Ellinor Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2010-06-22 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Duanping Liao; Michele L Shaffer; Fan He; Sol Rodriguez-Colon; Rongling Wu; Eric A Whitsel; Edward O Bixler; Wayne E Cascio Journal: J Toxicol Environ Health A Date: 2011
Authors: Jared W Magnani; Mary Ann Williamson; Patrick T Ellinor; Kevin M Monahan; Emelia J Benjamin Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2009-02
Authors: Amir A Mahabadi; Bharat Samy; Sujith K Seneviratne; Michael H Toepker; Fabian Bamberg; Udo Hoffmann; Quynh A Truong Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2009-02-14
Authors: Jelena Kornej; Jared W Magnani; Sarah R Preis; Elsayed Z Soliman; Ludovic Trinquart; Darae Ko; Emelia J Benjamin; Honghuang Lin Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 6.343