Literature DB >> 1733847

Rapid physical mapping of cloned DNA on banded mouse chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

A L Boyle1, D M Feltquite, N C Dracopoli, D E Housman, D C Ward.   

Abstract

Physical mapping of DNA clones by nonisotopic in situ hybridization has greatly facilitated the human genome mapping effort. Here we combine a variety of in situ hybridization techniques that make the physical mapping of DNA clones to mouse chromosomes much easier. Hybridization of probes containing the mouse long interspersed repetitive element to metaphase chromosomes produces a Giemsa-like banding pattern which can be used to identify individual Mus musculus, Mus spretus, and Mus castaneus chromosomes. The DNA binding fluorophore, DAPI, gives quinacrine-like bands that can complement the hybridization banding data. Simultaneous hybridization of a differentially labeled clone of interest with the banding probe allows the assignment of a mouse clone to a specific cytogenetic band. These methods were validated by first mapping four known genes, Cpa, Ly-2, Cck, and Igh-6, on banded chromosomes. Twenty-seven additional clones, including twenty anonymous cosmids, were then mapped in a similar fashion. Known marker clones and fractional length measurements can also provide information about chromosome assignment and clone order without the necessity of recognizing banding patterns. Clones hybridizing to each murine chromosome have been identified, thus providing a panel of marker probes to assist in chromosome identification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1733847     DOI: 10.1016/0888-7543(92)90412-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genomics        ISSN: 0888-7543            Impact factor:   5.736


  22 in total

Review 1.  Mouse chromosome 12.

Authors:  P D'Eustachio
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 2.  Mouse chromosome 15.

Authors:  B A Mock; P E Neumann; J T Eppig; K E Huppi
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 3.  Mouse chromosome 4.

Authors:  C M Abbott; R Blank; J T Eppig; J M Friedman; K E Huppi; I Jackson; B A Mock; J Stoye; R Wiseman
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 4.  Mouse chromosome 9.

Authors:  D M Kingsley
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  Presynaptic association of Rad51 protein with selected sites in meiotic chromatin.

Authors:  A W Plug; J Xu; G Reddy; E I Golub; T Ashley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Amplification of a DEAD box protein gene in retinoblastoma cell lines.

Authors:  R Godbout; J Squire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Localization of the cell death genes CPP32 and Mch-2 to human chromosome 4q.

Authors:  J Nasir; J L Theilmann; V Chopra; A M Jones; D Walker; D M Rasper; J P Vaillancourt; J E Hewitt; D W Nicholson; M R Hayden
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  Cloning and characterization of a second human NRAMP gene on chromosome 12q13.

Authors:  S Vidal; A M Belouchi; M Cellier; B Beatty; P Gros
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.957

9.  Rapid fluorescence in situ hybridization on interphasic nuclei to discriminate between homozygous and heterozygous transgenic mice.

Authors:  D Paris; K Toyama; A Mégarbané; P M Casanova; P M Sinet; J London
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.788

10.  Analysis and chromosomal localization of retrotransposons in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.): LINEs and Ty1-copia-like elements as major components of the genome.

Authors:  T Schmidt; S Kubis; J S Heslop-Harrison
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.