Literature DB >> 17338077

Executive summary: the Institute of Medicine report and the future of academic emergency medicine: the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine and Association of Academic Chairs in Emergency Medicine Panel: Association of American Medical Colleges annual meeting, October 28, 2006.

Daniel A Handel1, David P Sklar, Judd E Hollander, Brent R Asplin, Jerris R Hedges.   

Abstract

The findings in the Institute of Medicine's Future of Emergency Care reports, released in June 2006, emphasize that emergency physicians work in a fragmented system of emergency care with limited interhospital and out-of-hospital care coordination, too few on-call specialists, minimal disaster readiness, strained inpatient resources, and inadequate pediatric emergency services. Areas warranting special attention at academic medical centers (AMCs), both those included within the report and others warranting further attention, were reviewed by a distinguished panel and include the following: 1) opportunities to strengthen and leverage the educational environment within the AMC emergency department; 2) research opportunities created by emergency medicine (EM) serving as an interdisciplinary bridge in the area of clinical and translational research; 3) enhancement of federal guidelines for observational and interventional emergency care research; 4) recognition of the importance of EM residency training, the role of academic departments of EM, and EM subspecialty development in critical care medicine and out-of-hospital and disaster medicine; 5) further assessment of the impact of a regional emergency care model on patient outcomes and exploration of the role of AMCs in the development of such a model (e.g., geriatric and pediatric centers of EM excellence); 6) the opportunity to use educational loan forgiveness to encourage rural EM practice and the development of innovative EM educational programs linked to rural hospitals; and 7) the need to address AMC emergency department crowding and its adverse effect on quality of care and patient safety. Strategic plans should be developed on a local level in conjunction with support from national EM organizations, allied health care, specialty organizations, and consumer groups to help implement the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine report. The report recommendations and other related recommendations brought forward during the panel discussions should be addressed through innovative programs and policy development at the regional and federal levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17338077     DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  4 in total

1.  Survey of physicians regarding clinical pharmacy services in academic emergency departments.

Authors:  Jillian M Szczesiul; Rollin J Fairbanks; James M Hildebrand; Daniel P Hays; Manish N Shah
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 2.637

2.  Financial impact of emergency department crowding.

Authors:  Mathew Foley; Nizar Kifaieh; William K Mallon
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-05

3.  Telemedicine REsuscitation and Arrest Trial (TREAT): A feasibility study of real-time provider-to-provider telemedicine for the care of critically ill patients.

Authors:  Anish K Agarwal; David F Gaieski; Sarah M Perman; Marion Leary; Gail Delfin; Benjamin S Abella; Brendan G Carr
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2016-04-20

4.  Quality and Publication of Emergency Medicine Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov

Authors:  Lisa Calvocoressi; Jesse Reynolds; Benjamin Johnson; Meghan M Warzoha; Megan Carroll; Federico E Vaca; Lori Post; James Dziura
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-02-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.